Türkiye Jeoloji Bülteni
Türkiye Jeoloji Bülteni

Türkiye Jeoloji Bülteni

1980 ŞUBAT Cilt 23 Sayı 1
COVER
View as PDF
COPYRIGHT PAGE
View as PDF
CONTENTS
View as PDF
The Geology of The Western Taurids in The Area of Çatıdır (Sütçüler, Isparta), South The Eğridir Lake
Aydoğan Akbulut
View as PDF

Abstract: In the studied area formations of different structural setting are present. They have been classified and called, inascending order; Davras limestone, Çandır formation, Ophiolitie unit, Sütçüler formation And Aksu Çay formation.Davras limestone is apparently para-autochthonous. Çandır and Sütçüler formations have been correlated with theunits of the Western Taurids, in respect to facies and structure and suggested to be allochthonus,All of the Mesozoic units have been covered by EarlyMiocene Güneyce and Late Miocene Aksu Çay formations.

  • para-autochthon

  • allochthon

  • Davras limestone

  • Eğridir Lake

  • Western Taurids

  • Allasinaz, A., Gutnic, M. ve Poisson, A., 1974, La formation de l`Isparta Çay: Calcaires â Halobies, grés â plantes et radiolarites d`âge Carnien (?) - Norien (Taurides-Région d`IspartaTurquie).

  • Altınlı, E., 1944, Etude stratigraphique de la region d`Antalya. Rev. Pac. Sci. Univ. Istanbul, s`er. B, V, 9, no. 3.

  • Altınlı, E., 1945, Etude tectonigue de la region d`Antalya. Rev. Fac. 5 ci. Univ. Istanbul. Ser. B, V. 10, no. 1.

  • Bernouilli, D., De Graciansky, P., Ch.t Monod, O., 1974 The extension of the Lycian Nappes (SW Turkey) in to the Southearn Aegean Islands. Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae, 67, 1, 39-90.

  • Bignot, G., ve Poisson, A., 1974, Le Cénomanien du flane du Katran Dağ ( = Sam Dağ) prés d`Antalya (Turquie). Reprinted from

  • Bizon, G., Biju-Duval, B., Letouzey, X, Monod, O., Poisson, A., özer, B. ve Öztümer, E., 1974, Nouvelles precisions stratigraphiques concernant les bassins Tertiaires du Sud de la Turqoiie (An-talya, Mut, Adana,). Revue de I`lnstitut Francais du Pétrole, 1, 3, 305-325.

  • Blumenthal, M.M., 1951, Batı Toroslar`da Alanya ard ülkesinde jeolojik araştırmalar. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Enstitüsü, Ankara, no, 5, 1945.

  • Blumenthal, M.M., 1963, Le systeme structural du Taurus Sud-Anatolien, Livre â la, Mémoire du Prof. P. Fallot`da: Mem. hssér, Soc. Géol. de France, 11, 611-622.

  • Brunn, J.H. Dumont, J.F., Graciansky, P _ch. de, Gutnic, M., Juteau, Th., Marcoux, J. Monad, O. ve Poisson, A., 1971. Outline of the western Taurids. Geology and History of Turkey: Petroleum exploration Society of Libya. Tripoli, 225-255.

  • Brunn, J.H., 1974, Le probléme de l`oriğine des nappes et de leurs translations dans les Taurides occidentales. Extrait du Bull. Soc. Géol. Fr. (7). XVI. no. 2.

  • Collignon, M., Guerin-franiatta, Sb. Gutnic, M, et Juteau, Th., 1970 Découverte de Trias supérieur fossilifére a Ammonites dans la région d`Eğridir (Sud-Est du Taurus de pisidie, Turquie) C.R. Acad. Sc. 270, 2244-2252.

  • Dumint, J.F., Gutnic, M., Marcoux, X, Monod, O., Poisson, A., 1972, Le Trias des Taurides iccidentales. Définition du bassin pamphylien. Un nouveau domaine â ophiolites a la marge externe de la chaine taurique (Turquie) Z. Detsch. Geol. Ges. Band 123, 385-409. Vortrag gehalten auf dem 4 Agais symposium vom 28 bas 30.1.1972 in Hannover.

  • Dumont, J.F. ve Kerey, E., 1975, Eğridir Gölü güneyinin jeolojik özellikleri. Türkiye Jeoliji Kurumu 29. Bilimsel ve Teknik Kurultayı.

  • De Graciansky, P. eh. 1972, Recherches géologiques dans le Taurus Iycien (Turquie). Thése d`Etat, Univ. Paris-sud, Centre d`Orsay.

  • Gutnic, M., et Poisson, A., 1970, Un dispositif remanquable des chaines Tauriques dans le sud de la courbure d`Isparta (Turquie). C.R. Acad. Sc. Paris, 270, 672-675.

  • Gutnic, M., et Juteau, Th., 1973, Un exemple de coulées volcaniques sous-Marines d`âge jurassique dans le Taurus de Pisidie, environnement sédimentaire, spilitisation des pillowlavas de Balçıkhisar (Turquie). Sci. Terre, XVIII (2), 115-141.

  • Juteau, Th., 1970, Petrogénese des nappes d`Antalya (Taurus lycien oriental, Turquie). Leur liaison avec une phase d`expansion océanique au Trias superieur. Sci. Terre 15, (3), 265-288.

  • Juteau, Th. et Marcoux, J., 1973, Un exemple de volcanisme sousmarin au Trias supérieur le strato-volcan du Kara Dere Çalbalı Dağ (Ophiolites des nappes d`Antalya-Taurides occidentales-Turquie). Reun. Ann. des Sciences de la Terre, Paris.

  • Juteau Th., 1974, Les ophiolites de la nappe d`Antalya. Thése d`Etat, Nancy France.

  • Lefévre, R., et Marcoux, J. 1970, Schéma structural et esquisse stratigraphique des nappes d`Antalya dans leur segment sud-occidental (Taurus lycien, Turquie). C.R. Acad. Sc. Paris, sér. D, 271-287.

  • Marcoux, J., et Poisson, A., 1972, Une nouvelle unité structurale majeure dans les nappes d`Antalya: la nappe inférieure et ses séries Mésozoiques radiolaritiques (Taurioes occidentales, Turquie). C.R. Acad.Sc. Paris, sér. D. 655-658.

  • Marcoux, J., 1974, Alpine type Triasic of the Upper, Antalya nappe (Western Taurids Turquie). Die stratigraphie der alpin meditergranen Trias. Symposium Wien, Mai 1973.

  • Marcoux, J., 1975, Le séries Triasiques des nappes a radxolarites, et ophiolites d`Antalya (Turquie): homologie et signification probabla. Ve Colloque sur la géologle des régions Egennes, Orsay, France.

  • Monod, O., Marcoux, J., et Dumont, J.F., 1974, Le domaine d`Antalya témoin de la fracturaiton de la plateforme africaine au cours du Trias. Extrait du Bull. Soc. Géol. France (7) XVI, no. 2, 116-125.

  • Monod, O., 1975, La courbune d`lsparta, une mosaique de blocs autochtones rurmontés de nappes composites a l`extrémité de l`are Dinaro-Taurique. Ve Colloque sur la géologie des régions egéennes. Orsay, France.

  • Monod, O., 1977, Recherches géologiques dans le Taurus occidental an Sun de Beyşehir (Turquie). Thése d`Etat,, Univ. Paris-Sud, Centre d`Orsay France.

  • Özgül, N., 1969, Orta Torosların kuzey kesiminin yapısal gelişiminde blok hareketlerinin önemi. T.J.K. Bülteni, 14, no. 1.

  • Özgül, N.,1976, Torosların bazı temel jeoloji özellikleri. T.J.K. Bülteni, 19, 65-78, Ankara.

  • Parejas, E., 1942, Sandıklı, Dinar, Burdur, Isparta ve Eğridir bölgelerinde yapılan jeolojik löveler hakkında rapor. M.T.A. Rap. no. 1390, Ankara.

  • Poisson, A. ,1974, Préssanee de Jurassique et de Crétacé inférieur â faciés de type plateforme dans l`autochtone Lycien prés d`Antalya (massif des Beydağları, Turquie). C.R. Acad. Sc. Paris., t. 278, sér. D. 835-838.

  • Poisson, A. et Poignant, A.F., 1974 La formation de Karabayır, base de la transgression Miocéne dans la région de Korkuteli (Turquie). Bull, of the Min. Res. and Expl. Inst, of Turkey, no. 82, 67-71, Ankara.

  • Poisson, A., 1976, Assai d`interprétation d`une transversale Korkuteli Denizli (Taurus Ouest anatolien-Turquie), Bull. Soc. géol. France. (7) t. XVII, no. 2, 499-509.

  • Ricou, L., E., Argyriadis, I. et Lefévre, R., 1974, Proposition d`une origine pour les nappes d`Antalya et le massif d`Alanya (Taurides occidentales, Turquie). Extrait du Bull. Soc. géol. France. (7), XVI, no. 2, 107-111.

  • Sarp, H., 1976, Etude geologique et minéralogique du cortége ophiolitique de la region situ`" e au Nord-Ouest de Yeşilova (Burdur-Turquie). Thése Univ. de Genéve. Fac. des Sciences, Dept. de minéralogie.

  • Structural Evolution of Aladağ Mauntains in Taurus Belt
    Okan Tekeli
    View as PDF

    Abstract: Three different periods were effective in theEvolution of Aladağ Mountains. The first one is the stable continental marginperiod which occured from Upper to Lower Cretaceous. The second period includes the distraction of continental margin and the firstemplacement of ophiolites. During this phase continental margin was subsided due to block faulting and Senonian basin was developedon the platform type of carbonates of the shelf environment. The first emplacement of ophiolitic meterial was deosited in this basin toform an ophiolitie melange. The third period includes the deformation of continental margin and emplacement of peridotite nappe inMaastrichtian. Daring this time, Senonian basin was squeezed up by compressional stress and together with the basement it gainet acomplicated structure with several nappes. On top of these, Aladağ peridotit nappe and the metamorphic sheet, which occurs on thebottom of the Aladağ peridotite, were emplacement.

  • ophiolite

  • peridotit nappe

  • Maastrichtian

  • Senonian

  • Taurus

  • Argyriadis, I., 1974, Mésogée permienne, chaine hercynienne et cassure tétysienne: Bull. Soc. Géol. Fr., (7), XVII, 56-57.

  • Belov, A.A., 1973, Paleozoic tectonics of the Western and Central Taurus (Turkey): Academy of Scienses of the U.S.S.R., Geotectonics, 1, 31-38.

  • Brunn, H.J., Dumont, F.J., Graciansky Ch. P., Gutuic, M., Juteau Th., Harroux, J., Monod. O. ve Poisson, A., 1971, Outline of the Geology of the Western Taurids; Gamphell, S.A., ed., Geology and History of Turkey de: Tripoli, Libya, 225-255.

  • Blumenthal, M.M., 1952, Das taurische Hochgebirge das Aladağ, neuere Forschungen zur seiner Geographie, Stratigraphie und tektonik: MTA Enstitüsü yayınları, seri D, 6, 136 s.

  • Coleman, E.G., 1971, Plate tectonic emplacement of upper mantle peridotites along continental edges; J. Geophys. Res., 76. 1212

  • Dewey, J.F. ve Bird, J.M., 1971, Origin and emplacement of the ophiolite suite: Appalachian ophiolites in Newfoundland: J. Geophys. Res., 76, 3179-3206

  • Dewey, J.F., 1976, Ophiolite obduction: Tectonophysics, 31, 93-120.

  • Gass, G.I., Smith, G.A. ve Vine, J.F., 1975, Origin and emplacement of ophiolites: Geodynamics Today. The British Natiinal Comittee for Geodynamics.

  • Glennie, W.K., Boeuf, A.G.M., Clarke-Pugner, W.R., Stuart-Moody, M., Pilaar, H.F.W. ve Reinhard, M.B., 1974, Geology of the Oman Mountains: Verhandelingen van het Kaninklijk Nederlands geologish mijnbouwkundig Genootschap, 31, 423 s

  • Marcoux, J., 1978, A Scenario for the Birth of a New Oceanic Realm; The Alpine Neotethys: 13th Intern. Sed. Congress, 9-14 July, 1978, Israel.

  • Metz, K., 1956, Ein Beitrag zur Kenntiiis des Gebirgbaues von Aladağ aind Karanfil Dağı und ihres Westrandes (Kilikische Taurus): MTA Bült., 48, 68-78.

  • Özgül, N., Metin, S., Erdoğan, B., Göğer, E., Bingöl, İ. ve Baydar, O., 1973, Tufanbeyli dolayının (Doğu Toroslar, Adana) Kambriyen-Tersiyer kayaları: Türkiye jeol. Kur. Bült., 16, 1, 82-100.

  • Özgül, N., 19J76, Toroslar`ın bazı temel jeoloji özellikleri: Türkiye Jeol. Kur. Bült, 19, 1, 65-78

  • Ricou, L..E.; Argyriadis, I. ve Marcoux, J., 1975, L`axe calcaire du Taurus; un alignement de fenetres araboafricaines sous les nappes radiolaritiques, ophiolitiques et metamorphiques: Bull. Soc. Geol. Fr., (7), 17,1024-1044.

  • Stonoley, R., 1975, On the origin of ophiolite complexes In the southern Tethys region: Tectonophysics, 25, 303-322.

  • Origin of The Diabase Dykes in The Aladağ Ophiolite Sequence
    Okan Tekeli Yusuf Ayhan Erler
    View as PDF

    Abstract: The ophiolitic rocks, which were emplaced on the continental margin in the Aladağ region of Tauridsduring Maestrichtian, make up a sequence consisting of three units that are the ophiolitic melange at the base, themetamorphic slice over it, and the peridotite nappe at the top. One of the important subunits within the sequence isthe diabase dykes which transect the metamorphie slice and the peridotite nappe.The diabase dykes generally trend NE-SW and dip almost vertically. Their thicknesses range between 0.5-10 niThe dykes do not transect the ophiolitic melange and the Paleozoic and Mesozoic limestones underlying the melange.No dykes transecting metamorphics and peridotites together are observed.The diabase dykes exhibit crystal sizes varying from fine to medium, starting from cooling borders towards center. Dominant minerals are labradorite, augite, and hornblende. The dykes are subalkaline and tkoleiitic, composition isclose to that of abyssal tholeiites.The intrusion had occurred before the emplacement of the ophiolitic sequence, and most probably in an oceanicenvironment, since diabase dykes transect only the uppermost two unîts and they are close to abyssal tholeiites incomposition.

  • peridotit

  • ophiolitic melange

  • diabase dykes

  • Aladağ

  • Coleman R.G., 1977, Ophiolites: Springer-Verlag Berlin, 229s.

  • Çoğulu E., 1973, Htay-Kızıldağ masifinin oluşumu hakkında yeni buluşlar: Cumh. 50. yılı Yerbilimleri Kongresi Tebliğler, 409-423.

  • Çoğulu, E., Delaloye, M., Vuagııat, M., ve Wagner, J.J., 1975, Some geochemical, geochronological and petrophysical data on the ophiolitic massif from the Kızıl Dagh, Hatay-Turkey: C.R. Soc. Phys. Hist. Nat. Geneve, 10, 2/3, 141-150.

  • Irvine, T.N., ve Baragar, W.R.A., 1971, A guide to the chemical classification of the common volcanic rocks: Can. J. Earth Sc, 8, 52`3-548.

  • Juteau, T., 1975 ,Les ophiolites des nappes d`Antalya (Taurides occidentaies, Turquie): Sc. de la Terre, Mem. 32, Nancy, 692 s

  • Juteau, T., Nicolas, A., Dubessy, J., Fruchard, J.C., ve Bouchez, J.L., 1977, Structural relationships in the Antalya ophiolite complex, Turkey: Possible model for an oceanic ridge: Geol. Soc. America Bull., 88, 1740-1748.

  • Kay,R. , Hubbard, N.J., ve Gast, P.W., 1970, Chemical characteristics and origin of oceanic ridge volcanic rocks: J. Geophys, Res., 75, 1585-1613.

  • Miyashiro, A., 1975, Classification, characteristics, and origin of ophiolites: J. Geol., 83, 249-281.

  • Miyashiro, A., Shido, F. f ve Ewing, M., 1971, Metamorphism in the Mid-Atlantic Ridge near 24° and 30° N: Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, A268, 589-603.

  • Moores, E.M., ve Vine, F.J. 1971, The Troodos massif, Cyprus and other ophiolites as oceanic crust: Evaluation and implications: Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, A268, 443-466.

  • Parrot, J.F., 1973, Petrologie de la coupe du Djebel Moussa massif basique-ultrabasique du Kızıl Dag (Hatay, Turquie): Sc. de la Terre, Mem. 28, Nancy, 143-172

  • Rocci, G., 1973, Mesojen ofiyolitleri ve özellikle bazı intruziflerin rolü üzerine düşünceler: Cumh. 50. Yılı Yerbilimleri Kong., Tebliğler, 424-434.

  • Sun, S.S., ve Nesbitt, R.W., 1978, Geochemical regularities and genetic significance of ophiolitic basalts: Geology, 6, 689-693, Tegeli, O., 1978, Aladaflarda ofiyolit yerleşmesişi: Türkiye Jeol. Kur., 32. Bil. ve Tek. Kurultay Bildiri özetleri, 12.

  • Lithological Characteristics of The Amanos Mountain Range and Its Significance on The Tectonic Evolution of The Southeast Turkey
    Mehmet Namik Yalçin
    View as PDF

    Abstract: The aims of this work have been to establish tectonic position of the Amanos mountains with respect tothe tectonic units of the surrounding regions. To do that, time and mechanism of emplacement of ophiolites present in theregion were concentrated in the light of their relationship with the neighbouring rocks.A geological map of considerable portion in the region Jias been prepared and, stratigraphy and the lithological unitshas been established in detail.It has been concluded that the ophiolites have emplaced in their tectonic position as large and partly undisturbedthrust slices.Correlation of the lithological units of the Amanos mountains with the Arabian platform sequence has shown thesedimentary sequence of the Amanos mountains has been evolued as the northward extension of the Arabian plate.

  • ophiolite

  • tectonic evolution

  • Arabian plate

  • Amanos mountain

  • Altınlı, İ.E., 1079, Amanos dağları ve Anadolunun levha tektoniği ile ilişkileri: Türkiye 4. Petrol Kongresi Tebliğleri, 51-62

  • Arpat, E. ve Şaroğlu, F., 1975, Türkiye`deki bazı önemli genç tektonik olaylar: Türkiye Jeoloji Kurumu Bülteni, 18, 1, 91-101.

  • Aslaner, M., 1973, İskenderun - Kırıkhan bölgesindeki ofiyolitlerin jeoloji ve petrografisi: MTA yayını, no. 150.

  • Atan, O. R., 1969, Eğribucak - Karacaören .(Hassa) - Ceylanlı - Dazevleri (Kırıkhan) arasındaki Amanos dağlarının jeolojisi: M.T.A. Yayını., No. 139.

  • Brown, T.E., 1959, Stratigraphic report Hassa area, petroleum district VII Southeast Turkey: American Overseas Petroleum Limited, Rapor No: 312, yayınlanmamış.

  • Bryant, G.F., 1960, Stratigraphic report Amanos mountains area Southeast Turkey: American Ovirseas Petroleum Limited, Rapor No. 906, yayınlanmamış

  • Çoğunlu, H.E., 1975. Hatay Ultramafitlerinin Jeoloji ve Petrolojisi; TBAG-62 Projesi, TÜBİTAK, Ankara.

  • Demirtaşlı, E., 1973, İran, Pakistan ve Türkiye`deki Alt Paleozoyik yağlı kayaların stratigrafik korelasyonu: Cumhuriyetin 50. yılı Yerbilimleri Kongresi, 204-223.

  • Eroskay, O., Yılmaz, Y., Gürpınar, O.t Yalçın, N., Gözübol, A.M., 1978, Ceyhan-Berke Rezervuarmm Jeolojisi ve Mühendislik özellikleri: Türkiye Jeoloji Kurumu Bülteni, 21, 51-66

  • Freund, H.; Zak, I. ve Garfunkel, Z.. 1968, Age and rate of sinistral movement along the Dead Sea rift: Nature, 220/5164, 253-255

  • Ishmawi, R., 1972, Geologie des nördlichen Mittelteiles des AmanosGebirgeszwischen islahiye und Bahçe (S. Türkei): Geotekt. Forschungen, 42, 34-65.

  • Janetzko, P., 1972, Geologische Untersuchungen an der Ostflanke des südlichen Amanos-Gebirges zwischen İslahiye und Hassa: Geotekt. Forschungen, 42, 1-34.

  • Ketin, İ., 1966, Güneydoğu Anadolu`nun Kambriyen teşekkülleri ve bunların Doğu tran Kabriyeni ile mukayesesi: MTA Mecmuası, 66, 75-87.

  • Krummenacher, R. ve Dean, W.T., 1961, Cambrian triloyites from the Amanos-Mountains, Turkey: Paleontology, 4, 71-81.

  • Lahner, L., 1972, Geologische Untersuchungen aa der Ostflanke des mittleren Amanos: Geotekt. Forschungen, 42, 71-81.

  • Schwan, W. 1971, Geology and tectonics of the central Amanos mountains: Geology and History of Turkey, The Petroleum Exploration Society of Libya, 283-303.

  • Tuna, D. 1973, VI. Bölge litostratigrafi birimleri adlamasmm açıklayıcı raporu: TPAO, Rapor no. 813, Ankara.

  • Yalçın, N., 1978, K. Maraş-Gaziantep arasındaki allokton birimlerin ayırtlanması ve ilişkileri: İ.Ü.F.F. Tatbiki Jeoloji Kürsüsü Kitaplığı, yayınlanmamış.

  • Yalçın, N., 1979, Doğu Anadolu Yanlımı`nın Türkoğlu - Karaağaç (K. Maraş) arasındaki kesiminin özellikleri ve bölgedeki yerleşme alanları: Türkiye 33. Jeoloji Bilimsel ve Teknik Kurultayı, Altınlı Simpozyumu, baskıda.

  • Tectonics of The Lâdik-Destek Region
    Ali Öztürk
    View as PDF

    Abstract: The area of study includes a part of the North Anatolian fault zone was affected by the Hereynian andAlpine orogenic and epeirogenie movements. As a result, the rocks of the region were folded and faulted. Traces of theHereynian movements were generally obliterated by the orogeny.In Lâdik-Destek region, the folds of either Hercynian-Alpine system have on almost east-west trend, whilethe stress causing these folds was effective an the-south direction.The faults in the area are usually parallel to the fold axes. Moreover, the transversal and oblique faults werealso developed as a secondary system. These secondary faults having a general north-south direction are youngerthan the previous ones.One of the most important structures of the studied area is of course the North Anatolian earth-quake fault.It is highly probable that the fault was formed in an older fracture zone towards the end of Miocene. Total displacement sofar measured along this dextral fault is about 80-85 km. The movement of this presently active fault may bea result of pushing of the Anatolian plate pushed westwards by the Arabian plate.

  • North Anatolian fault zone

  • Miocene

  • Lâdik-Destek region

  • Alpine system

  • Abdüsselamoğlu, Ş., 1959, Almacıkdağı ile Mudurnu ve Göynük civarının jeolojisi: Fen Fakültesi Monografileri, Sayı 14, İstanbul.

  • Ambraseys, N.N., 1970, Some characteristic features of the Anatolian fault zone: Tectonophysics, 9, 143-165.

  • Ataman, G., Buket, E. ve Çapan, U., 1975, Kuzey Anadolu Fay zonu bir Paleo-Benioff zonu olabilir mi?: Maden Tetkik ve Arama Enstitüsü Dergisi, 84, 112-118.

  • Aytun, A., 1973, Ismetpaşa İstasyonu civarında krip ölçümleri: Kuzey Anadolu Fayı ve Deprem Kuşağı simpozyumu, Ankara, 114-121.

  • Blumenthal, M., 1943, Lâdik deprem hattı. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Enstitüsü Mecmuası, 1/33, 153-162.

  • Blumenthal, M.,1945, Niksar güneyindeki Keikit dislokasyonu ve tektonik ilgi: Maden Tetkik ve Arama Enstitüsü Mecmuası, 2/34, 372-379.

  • İlhan, E., 1976 Türkiye Jeolojisi. O.D.T.Ü. Mühendislik Fakültesi, Yayın No. 51. Ankara, 239.

  • Ketin, İ., 1969, Kuzey Anadolu Fayı hakkında: Maden Tetkik ve Arama Enstitüsü Mecmuası, 72, Ankara, 1-28

  • Öztürk, A., 1979, Lâdik-Destek yöresinin stratigrafisi: Türkiye Jeol. Kur. Bült. 22, 1, 27-34.

  • Pavoni, N., 1961, Die. Nordanatolische Horizontalverschiebung: Geol. Rdsch., 51, 122-139.

  • Seymen, İ., 1974, Kelkit Vadisi kesiminde Kuzey Anadolu Fay Zonunun tektonik özelliği: Doktora tezi, İ.T.Ü. Maden Fakültesi, İstanbul. 192.

  • Tokay, M., 1973, Kuzey Anadolu Fay Zonunun Gerede ile Ilgaz arasındaki kısmında jeolojik gözlemler: Kuzey Anadolu Fayı ve Deprem Kuşağı simpozyumu, Ankara, 12-29.

  • The Paleogeographical Interpretation of The Mudurnu-Göynük Basin Based on The Depositional Features of The Jurassic and Later Ages
    Salih Saner
    View as PDF

    Abstract: The sedimentary rocks of Mesozoic and Tertiary in the Mudumu-Göynük basin are more than five kilometers in thickness. This sequence is seen overlying granitic rocks in the south; but in the western part of the basinit can be seen either on the granitic rocks -Permo-Triassic aged rock units. First, Mesozoic sedimentation began in fower Jurassic and sandstones of Lias series deposited in the troughs ofthe paleotopography. The sea transgressed in Middle-Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous and covered lands-earlyJurassic in the area. The eastern and northeastren parts of the basin were relatively deeper than the western part inthis phase. In the Late Cretaceous the basin reached the deepest position entirely and fiyseh sediments were depositedin the whole area. The uplifting of the southern part by the tectonic events in the end of late upper Cretaceous formedan east-west trending shoreline. The regression continued during the Paleocese and this shoreline had regressed tothe north, but shallow marine conditinos prevailed in the of this shoreline. In Early Eocene a new transgression occured, without getting much deeper the sea regressed again in late Eocene and Oligocene. The continental conditions continued until recent in the area. Some lakes formed especially in tectonical depressed areas in Miocene and Quaternary

  • granitic rocks

  • flysch

  • transgression

  • regression

  • Mudurnu-Göynük basin

  • paleogeographical

  • Abdüsselamoğlu, M.Ş., 1959, Almacık dağı ile Mudurnu ve Göynük civarının jeolojisi: İst. Üniv. Fen Fak. Monografileri, Tabii ilimler kısmı, sayı 14,

  • Altınlı, I.E., Saner, S., 1971, Bilecik yakın dolayının jeolojisi: İst. Üniv. Fen Fak. Mecm., seri B, Cilt XXXVI, no. 1-2.

  • Altınlı, I.E., Saner, S.,Yetiş., C, 1972, BayıkÖy - Osmaneli alanının jeolojisi: İst. Üniv, Fen Fak. Mecm., Seri B, Cilt XXXVII, no. 1-2.

  • Altınlı, I.E., Saner, S.,1973a: Orta Sakarya`nın jeolojisi: Tebliğ, Türkiye Cumhuriyeti 5O.nci yılı uluslararası jeoloji kongresi, Ankara.

  • Altınlı, I.E., Saner, S.,1973b, Bilecik jurasigi: Tebliğ, Türkiye Cumhuriyeti 50. nci yılı uluslararası jeoloji kongresi, Ankara.

  • Bingöl, E., Akyürek, B. Korkmazer, B., 1973, Biga yarımadasının jeolojisi ve Karakaya formasyonunun bazı özellikleri: Cumhuriyetin 50.nci yılı, Yerbilimleri kongresi tebliğleri, Ankara.

  • Bingöl, E., Akyürek, B. Korkmazer, B.,1976, Batı Anadolu`nun jeotektonik evrimi: MTA mecm., no. 86.

  • Demirkol, C, 1973, Üzümlü-Tuzaklı (Bilecik ili) dolayının jeolojisi: doktora tezi, İst. Üniv. Fen Fak. Tatbikî Jeoloji Kürsüsü arşivi, İstanbul.

  • Eroskay, S.O., 1965, Paşalar bogazı-Gölpazarı sahasının jeolojisi: 1st. Üniv. Fen Fak. Mecm., seri B, cilt XXX, sayı 3-4, S. 135-170.

  • Granit, Y., et Tintant, H., I960, Observations préliminaices sur le Jurassique de la région de Bilecik (Turquie): Lab. de Géol., Faculté des Sciences, Dijon.

  • Gürpınar, O.f 1976, Geological investigation fof the Bilecik-İnegöl - Yenişehir territories together with a study of engineering properties of the Bilecik Limestone: 1st. Üniv. Fen Fak. Mecm., seri B, Cilt 41, no. 1-4.

  • Saner, S., 1978a, Orta Sakaryadaki Üst Kretase-Paleosen-Eosen çökelme ilişkileri ve Anadoludaki petrol aramalarındaki önemi: Dördüncü Petrol Kongresi Tebliğleri, Ankara.

  • Saner, S.,1978b, Geology and the environments of deposition of GeyveOsmaneli-Gölpazarı-Taraklı area: İst. Üniv. Fen Fak. Mecm., seri B, cilt 43, sayı 1-2.

  • Ürgün, S., 1956: Gölpazarı-Geyve-Taraklı-Göynük civarının jeolojisi: MTA Rap. no. 2711.

  • Yılmaz, Y., 1977, Bilecik-Sögüt dolayındaki eski temel karmaşığının petrogenetik evrimi: İst. Üniv. Fen Fak. Tatbiki Jeoloji Kürsüsü, doçentlik tezi.

  • Volcanosediments in Seben Region (Bolu SE)
    Baki Erdoğan Varol Nizamettin Kazanci
    View as PDF

    Abstract: The fragmental volcanic rocks of Seben region (Bolu SE Turkey) are typified by epiclastics in UpperCretaceous, while they are characterized by pyroclastics and autoclastics in Miocene. Epiclastics are well bedded andusually made of crystal and vitric tuffs, but occasional levels of lithic tuffs are also encountered. All of these components were rapidly eroded and transported away from volcanic areas.Pyroclastics consist of local vulcanien breccias and widespread cold pyrociastic flow breccias as well as agglomerates. These pyrociastic succession is overlain by autoclastic breccias. All of fragments have andesitic-basaltic features. The volcanosediments of Miocene in the north-northeast of Seben essentially have been derived from volcanic ventswith phreatic eruptions.

  • pyroclastic

  • breccias

  • Volcanosediment

  • Seben Region

  • Brousse, R. ve Lefevre, C, 1966, Nappes de ponces du Cantal et du Mont Dore. Leurs aspects volcanologique et mineralogique: Bull. Soe. geol., Fr., 8, 223-245.

  • Crowe, B.M. ve Fisher, R.V., 1973, Sedimantary structures in BaseSurge deposits with special reference to cross-bedding, Ubehebe Craters, Death Walley, California: Geol. Soc. America Bull., 84, 663-682.

  • Fisher, R.V., 1958, Definition of volcanic breccia: Geol. Soc. America Bull., 69, 1071-1073.

  • Fisher, R.V.,1960a, Classification of volcanic breccias: Geol. Soe. America Bull., 71, 973-982.

  • Fisher, R.V.,1960b, Criteria for recognition of laharic breccias, Southern Cascade Mountains, Washington: Geol. Soc. America Bull., 71, 127-132.

  • Fisher, R.V.,1961, Proposed classification o f volcaniclastic sediments and rocks: Geol. Soc. America Bull., 72, 1400-1414.

  • Fisher, R.V.,1971, Features of coarse grained, high concentration fluids and their deposits: Jour. Sed. Petrology., 41, 916-927.

  • Fisher, R.V. ve Waters, A.C., 1970, Base surge bed forms in maars volcanoes: Am. Jour. Sci., 268, 157-180.

  • Fiske, E.S., 1963, Subaqueous pyroclastic flous in the Ohanapecosh Formation, Washington: Geol. Soc. America Bull., 74, 391-406.

  • Füchtbauer, H. ve Müller, G., 1970, Sedimente und sedimentgesteine: ` Verlagsbuehhandlung, Stuttgart, 726

  • Leonhard, R., 1903, Geologische skizze des Galatischen Andesigebietes nördüsh von Ankara: N: Jb. Min. B., 16, 99-109

  • Milch, L., 1903, Die Ergussgesteine des Galatishen Andesigebietes: ` N. Jb. Min. B., 16, 110-165.

  • Norton, W.H., 1917, Studies for students; A classification of breccias: J. Geology, 25, 160-194.

  • Öngür, T., 1977a, Parçalı volkanik kayaların sınıflama ve adlanması: Yer. ve İns., I, 1-12

  • Öngür, T.,1977b, Kızılcahamam GB`sinin volkanolojisi ve petroloji incelemesi; Türkiye Jeol. Kur. Bült.a 20/2, 1-13.

  • Paicheler, J.C., 1977, Volkanotortul çökeller: Yer. ve İns., II/3, 11-17.

  • Paicheler, J.C.,1978, Beşkonak (Kuzey Anadolu - Türkiye) Tersiyer gölünde volkanik paleoortam ve tortulkatgı örnekleri: Türkiye Jeol. Bült, 21/1, 11-27.

  • Roıidot, J., 1956, 1/100 000 lik 39/2 (Güney kısmı) ve 39/4 no`lu paf- ; talarıh jeolojisi: Maden Tetkik Arama Enst., derleme, rap. No: 2517, yayımlanmamış.

  • Ross, C.S., 1955, Provenience of pyroclastic materials: Geol. Soc. America Bull., 66, 427-434.

  • Schimincke, H.U., 1967, Graded laharsin the type sections of the Ellensburg Formation, South Central Washington: Jour. Sed. Petrology, 37, 438-448.

  • Schimincke, H.U.,ve Swanson, D.A., 1967, Laminar viscous flowage structures in ash-flow tuffs from Gran Canaria, Canary Islands: J. Geology, 75, 641- 664.

  • Wentworth, C.K. ve Williams, H., 1932, The classification and terminology of the pyroclastic rocks: Nat. Res. Concil Bull., 89, 19-53.

  • Geological Study of Horoz Granodiorite
    Faruk Çalapkulu
    View as PDF

    Abstract: The Horoz granodiorite is located in the eastern part of the Bolkardağ. A detorled study of the gra-nodiorite showsthat the emplacement is shallow and has "delayed tectonics" sharacter. The emplacement of the granodiorite has increased thegeothermal gradient of the region. The dyke rocks which are related to the granodiorite are, in the order of emplacement, Biotitebearing tonalite porphyry, Muscovite bearing tonalite porphyry, and Diorite porphyry. The volume of these dykes within thegranodiorite body decrease inversely with time. Some of them are emplaced parallel to the main axis of the granodiorite during theevolution of the body. However, diagonally emplaced dykes are better developed and their directions change with time. 

  • The Horoz granodiorite

  • Muscovite tonalite porphyry

  • Diorite porphyry

  • Biotite tonalite porphyry

  • Bingöl, E.. 1974, 1/2500000 ölçekli Türkiye metamorfizma haritası ve bazı metamorfik kuşakların jeotektonik evrimi üzerine tartışmalar; Maden Tetkik ve Arama Enstitümü dergisi, 83, 178-184.

  • Blumenthal, M., 1947, Belemedik Paleozoik penceresi ve bunun Mezozoik kalker çerçevesi (Klikya Torosları): Maden Tetkik ve Arama Enstitüsü Yayınları, Ankara, Seri D, No. 3, 93 s.

  • Blumenthal, M., 1956, Yüksek Balkardağın kuzey bölgelerinin ve batı uzantılarının jeoloji: Maden Tetkik ve Arama Enstitüsü yayınları, Ankara, Seri D, No. 7, 179 s.

  • Çalapkulu, F., 1976, Le charriage de 1`unite ophiolitique de Alihoca sur les marbles de Bolkardağ (Taurus-Turquie): Abstract, 4° Reunion Annuelle des Sciences de la terre Paris, 89.

  • Daly, R.M., 1938, Igneous rocks and their origin: Elsevier Publishing Company, New York, 162 s.

  • Demirtaşlı, E., Bilgin, Z., Erenler, F., Işıklar, S., Sanlı, D., Selim, M. ve Turhan, N., 1973, Bolkardağlarının jeolojisi: Cumhuriyetin 50. yıl Yer Bilimleri kongresi, Maden Tetkik ve Arama Enstitüsü, Ankara, 42-57.

  • Helke, A., 1929, Die Geologischen verhaltnisse des silber-bleivorkommens von Bulgar Maden: Tez, Bergakademie in Freiberg, 193 s.

  • Kruse, G., 1965, Stratigraphische unterersuchungen en erzfuhrenden, Permischen kalken in Hohen Bolkardağ (Kilikiseher-Taurus): Doktora tezi, Ludwig-Maximillians-Universitat, Munchen, 55. s.

  • Launay. L.., 1911, La géologie et les ricaesses minérales de l`Asie: ch. Barranger, Paris, I, 816 s

  • Özgül, N., 1976, Toroslarm bazı temel jeolojik özellikleri: Türkiye Jeol. Kur. Bült 19, 1, 65-78.

  • Shard, J..T., 1946, Eruptive rocks: Murphy and Co, London, 213 s.

  • Hydrothermal Alteration of Volcanogenic Massive Suphilde Deposits in The Eastern Black Sea Region, Turkey
    Memet Namik Çağatay
    View as PDF

    Abstract: Detailed mineralogical and chemical studies of hydrothermal alteration of the Madenköy, Kutlular, Kotarak Dere, Tunca, Sırtköy and Sarısu volcanogenic sulphide deposits in the Eastern Black Sea ore province of Turkeywere carried out with the aims of obtaining a better understanding of the ore forming environments and establishingfavourable criteria for discovering economic ore bodies. X-ray diffraction and thin-section studies of the footwall andhanging-wall rocks indicate that the orebodies are enveloped by extensive and regular argillic zones which also includesome carbonate minerals such as calcite, dolomite, and siderite. Zeolite minerals were found in volcanics surroundingthe clay zones. However, significance of the Zeolitic zones still remains to be investigated. Continuation of the alteration zone in the hanging-wall rocks demonst-rate that the hydrothermal activity continued for a while after the formation of the orebodies. The most intensive and extensive alteration is, however, foundin the dacitic footwall rocks.The main similarity in all the mineralized areas studied is that the common form of alteration associated with oredeposition is sericitization (including the presence of illite) of the dacitic footwall rocks, which are also commonlyassociated with silicification.The alteration mineral paragenesis suggest that the oresolutions were acidic during the formation of the orebodiesand kaolinite and sericite zones, but became alkaline with declining temperatune towards the end of ore deposition.During this second phaseshemalitization and carbonitization processes took place in the host rocks.Semi-quantitative evaluation of the ``Clay (kaolinite + montmorillonite + illite + sericite)/Feldspar" ratio by aX-ray diffraction method is useful in detecting the jpresenee and intensity of hydrothermal activity related to sulphidemineralization. The Clay/Feldspar ratio as well as regular zonation properties of the alteration minerals can also beused as direction vectors during detailed exploration studies.Geochemical studies of the host rocks support the hydrothermal alteration characteristics determined by themineralogical technigues.

  • Massive Suphilde Deposit

  • Zeolite

  • carbonate minerals

  • Hydrothermal Alteration

  • sericit

  • Eastern Black Sea

  • Çağatay, M.N., 1977, Development of geochemical exploration techniques for massive sulphide ore deposits, Eastern Black Sea region, Turkey. Londra Üniversitesi, Doktora tezi, yayınlanmamış.

  • Çağatay, M.N. ve Boyle, D.R., 1977, Geochemical prospecting1 for volcanogenic sulphide deposits in the Eastern Black Sea ore province, Turkey. J. Geochem. Explor., 8, 49-71.

  • Çağatay, M.N. ve Boyle, D.H, 1978, Geology, geochemistry and hydro thermal alteration of the Madenköy massive sulphide deposit, Eastern Black Sea region, Turkey. 5 th IAGOD Symposium, Utah, U.S.A. August, 1978 (Baskıda).

  • Iijima, A., 1974, Clay and zeolitic alteration zones surrounding Kuroko deposits in the Hokuroku district, Northern Akita, as Submarine hydrothermal-diagenetic alteration priducts; Ishihara, S . (ed.), Geology of Kuroko Deposits de: The Society of Mining Geologists of Japan, Special Issue, No. 6, 267-290.

  • Meyer, W.T. ve Hemley, J.J., 1967, Wall rock alteration; in Barnes, H.L. ed., Geochemistry of hydrothermal ore deposits, de: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., New York, 166-235.

  • Nebioğlu, T.Y., 1975, Madenköy (1) sahasının jeoloji haritası (1:1000 ölçekli). M.T.A Arşiv No. 31134.

  • Shirozu, H., 1974, Clay minerals in altered wall rocks of the Kuroko type deposits; Ishihara, S. ed, Geolgy of Kuroko Deposits`

  • Two New Genera of Radiolitidae (Balabanla N. Gen., Kurtinian. Gen.) From Turkey
    Necdet Karacabey - Öztümer
    View as PDF

    Abstract: Decscriptions of two new genera (Balabania andKurtinia) and their five new species (B. acuticostata, B. elongata, B.densicostata, B. melitenensis, nad K. hemis pherica) found in Maestrichtian of Malatya region have been given.

  • Maestrichtian

  • Radiolitidae

  • Malatya

  • Turkey

  • Charvet, J., Decrouez, D. et Polsak, A., 197G, Le cretecĞ du Foniakos (Argolide, Grâce): Examen pal^ontologique, repercussions stratigraphiques, paleogeographiques et tectoniques: Archives des sciences, Geneve, 247-257.

  • Karacabey-Öztemür, N., 1974, Sur une nouvella espfcce de Colveraia Klinghardt et une nouvelle sous-espâce de Joufia Boehm en Turquie: Bull, of the MTA, Ankara, 82, 78-85.

  • Milovanovic, B., 1934, Contribution â la connaissance de la structure de la couche externe des Rudistes: Bull, du serv. G4il. du Roy. de Yougoslavie, Belgrade, 4, 1, 223-262.

  • Milovanovic, B., 1935 a, Sur les Rudistes maestrichtien dans la partie orientale de la peninsule Balkanique; Geologica Balkanica, Sofia, 1, 3, 127-137.

  • Milovanovic, B., 1935 b, Les nouveaux Rudistes de la Serbie: Acad. Roy. Serbe, Belgrade, B, 3, 1-42.

  • Milovanovic, B., 1937, Sur les excroissances tubulaires â la surface de la coquille du genre Pseudopolyconites Mil.: Ann. G£ol. de la peninsule Balkanique, Belgrade, 14, 97-130.

  • Moore, R.C., 1969, Treatise on învertebraye Paleontology, N, 2, 6, 803-817.

  • Pasic, M., 1957, Biostratigraphische verhaltr.isse und tektonik der oberkreide in der weiteren umgebung vin Kosjeric (West Ser¬bian). Belgrad.

  • Sladic-Trifunovic, M., 1977, A new radlolitid genus from the senonfen sediments of Fundina (Montenegro) and Povlja (Brae Island): Ann. G(ol. de la peninsule Balkanique, Belgrade, 41, 221-226.

  • Sarmatian Elphidums of Pazar (Rize) Area
    Türker Yetkin Özsayar
    View as PDF

    Abstract: Data about the extension of Sarmatian Sea in North Anatolien is scarce. The Sarmatien beds are already knownfrom İstanbul-Küçükçekmece, Sinop and Pazar areas.In this paper the Elphidiien of Sarmatian beds from Pazar area (figure 1) are described. Nearly all species arecomparable with the other known Elphidiien fauna of the same age. In the fauna the coarse spined species are abundant. Big differences are not observed in a comparision with Middle Sarmatien Elphidiien fauna of Sinop area.In addition to these, a new species is also described. 

  • Sarmatian

  • Elphidum

  • North Anatolien

  • Rize

  • Brestenska, E., 1974, Die Foraminiferen des Sarmatien s. str.: In Papp et. all., Mr , Sarmatien, Veda Verlag. Bratislava, 243-270

  • Chaput, E., Gillet, S., 1939, Les faunes de Mollusques des terrains a Hipparion gracile de Küçükçekmece pres Istanbul: Bull. Soc, geoit, Fr. Cilt VIII, sayı 5-6, Paris.

  • Cushman, J.A., 1939, A monograph of the Foraminiferal Family Nonionidae: Prof. Pap., 191, Geol., surv., Washington.

  • Grill, R., 1943, Über mikropalaeontologische Gliederungsmöglichkeiten in Miozaen des Wiener Beokens: Mitt. Reichsanst., Bodenforsoh., 6, Viyana, 33-44

  • Krageninnikov, V.A., 1958, O stroenii ust`ja u nekotorych predtavitelej nonionich i élfidüeb: Voprosy mikropal., Vyp. 2, Moskova, 105-120.

  • Kraşeninnikov, V.A., 1960 Elphidiidy miocenoyyçh otlozenij Podolii: Trudy Geol.. Inst. Akad. hauk. SSSR, no 21, Moskova, 142 S.

  • Marks, P., 1951, A revision of the smaller Foraminifera from the Miocene of the Vienna Basin: Cont. Cush. Found. Foraminifera, Râs. 2, Bridgewater, Mass.

  • d`Orbigny, A., 1846, Die Foessilen Foraminiferen des Tertiaeren Beekens, van Wien: Verlag. Gide et .Comp..Paris.

  • Papp, A., 1963, Die biostratigraphische Gliederung des Neogens im Wiener Becken: Mitt., Geol. Ges. 56, Viyana.

  • Özsayar, T., 1977a, Karadeniz kıyı bölgesindeki Neojen Formasyonları ve bunların Mollusk faunasının incelenmesi: KTÜ yayın no. 79, Trabzon.

  • Özsayar, T., 1977b, Einige bessarabische Elphidien aus Sinop (NordAnatolien): Giess. Geol. Schr. 12, Glesten.

  • Serova, M.Ja., 1955, Stratigrafija i fauna foraminifer miocenovych otlozeni j Predkarpatia: In: Materialy po biostratigrfli zap., obl., Ukr., SSR. Moskova.

  • Stancheva, M., 1960, Sarmatian foraminifera from north-western Bulgaria: Trud. Geol., Bulg. Ser. Paleont. II, Sofya.

  • Tollmann, A. ,1955, Foraminiferenentwicklung im Torton und Untersarmat in der Randfazies der Eisenstaedler Buch: Sitz. Bericht Akad. Wiss. 164/1-2, Viyana.

  • Turnovsky, K., 1963, Zonengliederung ,mit Foraminiferenfaunen und Okologie im Neogen des Wiener Beckens: Geol. Ges. 56,1, Viyana.

  • Venglisky, I.V., 1958, Foraminiferi miocenu Zakarpatia: Akad. nauk. Ukr. SSR., Kiev

  • Venglisky complexe , I.V. 1968, Phases in the development of foraminiferal s in the Miocene of Transkarpatian depression: In: Granica tretignogo cetvertignogo peridrov, Moskova.

  • Stratigraphy of Continental Neogene in The Region of Muğla - Yatağan, Turkey
    Zeki Atalay
    View as PDF

    Abstract: Two formations, mamed as Eskihisar and Yatağan have been recognized in the study area of Muğla-Yatağan, TurkeyBoth formations are formed from river and lakedeposits.Turgut member of Eskihisar formation contains Anomalomys gatidryi Gaillard, Mastodon (zygolophodon) tapiroides Cuvier and Anchitheriojn, sp. and Sekköy member of same formation contans Paralutra Jaegeri Filhol, Dinotheriumbiganteum Kaup, Brachypotherium brachypus Lartet. The fossils suggest that the Turgut member belongs to Middle Astracian and the Sekköy member to Upper Astracian.Madenler, Bayır and Bozarmut members of the Yatağan formation are of Turolian age according to H. medifenanieinHansel, D. pachygnathus Wagner, Gazella gandriyi Sch.

  • continental Neogene

  • Eskihisar formation

  • Yatağan formation

  • fossil

  • Muğla

  • Abdülselamoğlu, Ş., 11965, Muğla-Yatağan çevresinde görülen jeolojik formasyonların korelasyonları hakkında rapor: Maden Tetkik Arama Enst., Rap. no., 3497 Ankara

  • Becker-Platen, J.D; Siekenberg, D.Q. Tobien, H, 1975, Die Gliederung der Kanozoischen Sedimerte der Turkei nach Vertebraten Fannengruppen: Geol. fahr. Reihe B, Heft 15-pp. 19-45, Hannover. 1975, Vertebraten-Lokalfaunen der Turkei und ihre Altersstelleung: ibid, pp. 47-101 Hannover.

  • Benda, L., 1971, Principles of the palynoloqic subdivision of the Tur kish Neogene (Kanozoikum und Braunkohlen`der Turkei 3)- Newsl. Stratigr., 1, 3=23-26, 1971 a.

  • Benda, K, Heissig, K.Q. Steffens, P., 1975, The Stellning der Vertebraten-Fau nengruppen der Turkei ınnerhallo der chronastra- . tığraphıschen Systeme von Tethys und Paratethys: îbid; pp. 109-117, Hannover

  • Sickenberg, O., 1975, Die Beziehungen der anatolischen Saugetierfaunen zu jenen des Balkans und der Ağaischen Iseln-In-Sıckenberg, O.U. Mitarb Die Gliederung des höheren jungtertiörs oınd Altquartors in der Turkei nach Vertebraten und ihre Bedeutung für die internationale Neoqen-Stratigraphie: Geol. jb., B, 15=101 — 107 Hannover.

  • ISSUE FULL FILE
    View as PDF