Türkiye Jeoloji Bülteni
Türkiye Jeoloji Bülteni

Türkiye Jeoloji Bülteni

2006 AĞUSTOS Cilt 49 Sayı 2
COVER
View as PDF
COPYRIGHT PAGE
View as PDF
CONTENTS
View as PDF
Fe-Mn Mineralizations of Çamoluk (Burdur)
Yeliz Teker Mustafa Kuşcu
View as PDF

Abstract: Çamoluk (Burdur) iron-manganese mineralizations are found in the Middle Triassic-Liassic(Jurassic)Dutdere limestone. The mineralizations are situated in Akpınarkale Tepe, Kulübe Tepe andElmaçukuru locations. The iron-manganese mineralizations have thicknesses ranging from 0.6 m to 2 m andare seen generally cutting limestones in lenticular and normal vein forms. Mineral assemblage consists ofpyrolusite, psilomelane, cryiptomelane, hausmannite, hollandite, coronadite, chalcophanite, todorokite,braunite, manganite, pyrite, limonite (goethite), hematite, barite, quartz, cristobalite, calcite, chlorite,mica/illite, jarosite, and feldspar.In the iron-manganese occurrences, average composition is 30.51 % Fe O ,23.60 % MnO and 10.07 2 3% SiO . It was determined that the iron- manganese occurrences in the study area have high amounts of Ba, Sr, 2As, Zn, Pb, and Sb contents. Ba and Sr contents range between 0.4 % and 36.1 %, averaging 4.9 %, between0.01 % and 0.9 %, averaging 0.1%, respectively. Findings such as epigenetic vein form, mineral assemblage, higher trace element contents, and BaSr are significant evidences of a hydrothermal-metasomatic origin.

  • Dutdere limestone

  • Fe-Mn mineralization

  • hydrothermal-metasomatic

  • major-trace element contents


  • Başarı, N., 1980, Burdur yöresinin manganez oluşumları ve Bucak (Akpmarkale Tepe) Manganez Zuhuru jeoloji rapora MTA Enstitüsü, RaporNo; 6888,Ankara.

  • Biçen, C., 1975, Burdur yöresi Fe-Mn oluşukları ile ilgili prospeksiyonraporu,ıMTAGenel.Müdürlüğü,Ankara

  • Bostrom, K., and Valdes, S., 1969, Arsenic m the Ocean Floor: .... Lithos,v.2, p.351-360.

  • Buhn, B., Stamstreet, I.G. and Okrusch, M.,1992, Late Proterozoic Outer ShelfManganese and Iron Deposits at Otjosondu (Namibia) Related to the Damaran Oceanic Opening: Economic Geology, Vol.87, pp.

  • Choi, J. H. and Hanya, Y., 1992, Geochemistry and Depositional Environment of Mn Oxide deposits in the Tokoro Belt, Northeastern Hokkaido, Japan: Economic Geology, Vol.87, pp. 1265-1274.

  • Cronan, D.S., 1972, The Mid-Atlantic Ridge near 45 N, XVII: Al, As, Hg and Mn in ferruginous sediments from the median valley: Canadian Jour. Earth. Sci., v.9, p.319¬

  • Cronan, D.S., 1980, Underwater minerals: London, Academic Press, 364 p.

  • Delian, F., Dasgupta, S., Bolton, B.R., Hanya, Y., Momoı, H., Miura, H., Jıaju, L. and Roy, S., 1992, Mineralogy and Geochemistry of the Proterozoic Wafangzi Ferromanganese Deposit, China: Econ. Geol., v.87, pp.

  • Force, E.R and Cannon, B.F., 1988, Depositional model for shallow-marine manganese deposits around black shale basins: Economic Geology, Vol.83, pp. 93-117.

  • Gedıkoğlu, A., Van, A., Eyüpoğlu, I., ve Yalçmtaş, B., 1985, Doğu Karadeniz Cevherleşmesine bir örnek: Ocaklı (Maçka-Trabzon) Manganez Zuhuru, Jeoloji _ . . Mühendisliği, sayı.25, s.23-37.

  • Gültekm, A.H. and Örgün, Y., 1994, Mineralogical and Chemical Characteristics of the Binkılıç Sedimetary Manganese Deposit, Trakya, Turkey: Abstracts, 9th ■AGODSMnp^u.n.Bcun.y,

  • Hanya, Y., 1961, Mineralogical studies of manganese dioxide and hydroxide minerals in Hokkaido, Japan, Joum. Fac. .. Sc, Hokkaido Univ., 10,641-702...

  • Hewett, D.F. and Fleischer, M., I960, Deposits of the Manganese Oxides, Economic Geology, Vol.55, pp. 1- TT .AS

  • Hewett, D.F., Fleischer, M. and Conklin, 1963, Deposits ofthe manganese oxides: Supplement: Econ. Geol., v.58,p.l-

  • Hewett, D.F., 1964, Veins of hypogene manganese oxide minerals in the United States, Econ. Geol., 59, 1431- 1472,60,.no:l,pp.1-38.

  • Kuşçu, M., Gedıkoğlu, A., 1989, Ulukent (Tavas-Demzli) Güneyi Manganez Yataklarının Jeokimyasal Özellikleri, Yerbilimcinin Sesi, Sayı:17,s. 29-47.

  • Moorby, S.A., Cronan, D.S. and Glasby, G.P., 1984, Geochemistry of hydrothermal Mn-oxide deposits from the S.W. Pacific island arc: Geochim. Et Cosmochim. Acta, v.48, p.433-441.

  • Nicholson, K., 1992, Contrasting Mineralogical-Geochemical Signatures of Manganese Oxides, Guides to Metallogenesis, Economic Geology, Vol.87, pp. 1253- 1264.

  • Ossa, A.C., 1970, Genesis of manganese deposits in northern Chile: Econ. Geol., v.65, p.681-689.

  • Önder, O. ve Kurugol, G., 1983, Burdur-Bucak-Kestel Fe-Mn Zuhuru ve Burdur-Bucak yöresi Mn zuhurları jeoloji raporu: MTA Genel Müdürlüğü, Rapor No: 7413, Ankara

  • Özturk, H. and Frakes, L.A., 1995, Sedımentatıonand Diagenesis of an OligoceneManganese Deposit in a Shallow Subbasin of the Paratethys: Thrace Basin, Turkey, Ore Geology Reviews, v.10, p.117-132.

  • Manganese Oxide Deposits, Groote . Eylandt,Australia:EconGeol.v.87,pp. 1310-1335.

  • Roy, S., 1968, Mineralogy of the different genetic types of manganese deposits,Econ. Geol., 63,760-786.

  • Sıllıtoe, R.H., 1975, Lead-silver, manganese and native sulfur mineralization within a stratovolcano, El Queva, northwestArgentina: Econ. GeoL, v.70,p.ll90-120L

  • Stanton, R.L., 1972, Ore Petrology, McGraw-Hill, New York, _ . 713

  • Şenel, M., 1997, 1: 100 000 ölçekli Türkiye Jeoloji Haritaları, İsparta K-10 paftası, M.T.A. Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara.

  • Şenel, M., Selçuk, H., Bilgin, A.Z., Şen, A.M., Karaman, T., Dinçer, M.A., Durukan, E., Arbas, Örçen, S. ve Bilgi, C., 1989, Çameli (Denizli)-Yeşilova (Burdur)-Elmalı (Antalya) ve dolayımnjeolojisi; MTA Rap., 9429, 344 s.,Ankara (yayımlanmamış).

  • Teker, Y., 2004, Çamoluk (Burdur)-Yazıpmar (Bucak) Arasındaki Manganez Zuhurlarının Maden Jeolojisi ve Kökeninin Araştırılması, S.D.Ü. Fen Bilimleri EnstitüsuYüksek Lisans Tezi, İsparta, 60 s.

  • Vamavas, S.P., Papaıoannau, J. and Çatanı, J., 1988, A hydrothermal manganese deposit from the Eratosthenes seamount, eastern Mediterranean Sea: , . MarineGeology,v.81,p.205-214.

  • Zantop, H., 1978, Geologic setting and genesis of iron oxides and manganese oxides in the San Francisco manganese deposit, Jalisco, Mexico: Econ. Geol., v.73, p.1137¬1149.

  • Zantop, H., 1981, Trace elements m volcanogemc manganese oxides and iron oxides: the San Francisco manganese deposit, Jalisco, Mexico: Econ. Geol., v.76, p.545-555.

  • Teker, Y , Kuşcu, M . (2006). Çamoluk (Burdur) yöresi Fe-Mn cevherleşmeleri . Türkiye Jeoloji Bülteni , 49 (2) , 1-16 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tjb/issue/28448/303076

  • Sedimentology of Bottom Sediments From the Saros Bay (N Aegean Sea)
    Faruk Ocakoğlu Hakan Gençoğlu Sanem Açikalin
    View as PDF

    Abstract: The qualitative investigation of 54 grab samples and 14 gravity cores from the Saros Gulf was carriedout in order to understand the present and recent prevailing sedimantological conditions. Observations ongrab samples show that the western part of the northern shelf is covered by a sandy siliciclastic lobe.Gastropods prefer shallower (<-50 m) depths, while large bivalve shells are common within mud even at -150m water depth. Sedimentological evaluation of the gravity cores provided the occurrence of a type-1unconformity and overlying 50-130 cm thick fining/deepening upward cycle in the northern shelf as deep as -85 m water depth. Below this unconformity of at least 20 km extend, semi-consolidated salt-bearing mudoccurs while intraformational blocks and coquinites are found above. Based on the environmentalinterpretations and relating the obtained results to the previous works, this unconformity and followingsediments were assumed to be the record of Holocene transgression in the Saros Gulf.

  • Bottom sediments

  • Fossil content

  • Holocene transgression

  • Saros Gulf


  • Aksu, A.E., Hiscott, R.N. ve Yaşar, D., 1999. Oscillating Quaternary water levels of the Marmara Sea and vigorous outflow into the Aegean Sea from the Marmara SeaBlack Sea drainage corridor. Marine „ Ge?1ogy.153>275302.

  • Aksu., A.E., Hiscott., R.N.,, Kaminski, A., Mudıe, RJ., Gillespie, H., Abraiano, T., Yaşar, D., 2002. Last Glacial-Holocene paleoceanography of the Black Sea and Marmara Sea: stable isotopic, foraminiferal and coccolith evidence. Marine.Geology,190,119-149.

  • Ateş A. S., Katağan T., Kocataş A., Yırdabak E. F., 2005, Decapod (Crustacea) fauna of Saros Bay (Northeastern Aegean Sea), Turk. J. Zool., 29, 199-124.

  • Bargu, S., 1989/1990, Kuzey Anadolu Fayının Gazıkoy ve Mürefte (Tekirdağ) Dolaylarında Yapısal Özellikleri ve Hareket Mekanizması. İstanbul Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi, Yer Bilimleri _ Dergisi, İstanbul

  • Çağatay M. N., Gorur N., Alpar B., Saatçılar R., Akkok R., Sakmç M., Yüce H., Yaltırak C., Kuşçu I., 1998, Geological evolution of the Gulf of Saros, Geo-MarineLettersl8,^l-8.

  • Demırbağ, E., Gokaşan, E., Oktay, F.Y., Simsek, M., Yüce, H., 1998. The last sea level changes in the Black Sea: evidence from the seismic data.

  • Hıscott., R.N., Aksu., A.E., Yaşar, D., Kaminski, A., Mudie, P.J., Kostylev, V.E., MacDonald, J.C., İşler, F.I., Lord, A.R., 2002. Deltas South of the Bosphorus Strait record persistant Black Sea outflow to the Marmara Sea since last 10 ka. . Marine Geology, 190 95-118

  • Kaminski, M. A.., Aksu, A.E., Box, M., Hıscott., R.N., Filipescu, S., Al-Salameen, M., 2002. Late Glacial Holocene benthic foraminifera in the Marmara sea: implication for black sea¬mediterranean sea connections following the last __ deglaciation. Marine Geology, 190,165-202.

  • Kurt, H., Demırbağ, E. Ve Kuşçu, İ., 2000. Active submarine tectonism and formation of the Gulf of Saros, Northeast Aegean Sea, inferred from multi¬channel seismic reflection data. Marine Geology, 165,1326.

  • MTA., 2002. 1/500.000 ölçekli Türkiye Jeoloji Haritası, İstanbul paftası. Şener, M. (ed). MTA Genel MüdürlüğüYaymları, Ankara.

  • Sarı E., 199?. Saros Korfezı`nın Geç Kuvatemer çökellerinin jeokimyasal ve sedimantolojik özellikleri, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Deniz Bilimleri ve İşletmeciliği Enstitüsü. İstanbul.

  • San E., and Çağatay M.N., 2001. Distribution of heavy metals in the surface sediments of the Gulf of Saros, NE Agean Sea, Environmental International, 26,169-173.

  • Tüysüz, O., Barka., A. ve Yığıtbaş, E., 1998. Geology of the Saros graben and its implications for the evolution of the North Anatolian fault in the GanosSaros region, northwestern Turkey. Tectonophysics,293 105126

  • Van Wagoner J.C., Posamantıer H. W., Mitchum R. M., VailP. R., Sarg J. F., LoutitT. S., andHardenbol J., 1988. An overview of the fundamentals of Sequence stratigraphy and key definitions, Sea-level Changes-An Integrarted Approach, SEPM Special Publication, 42, 39-45.

  • Yaltırak, C., Alpar, B. Ve Yüce, H., 1998. Tectonic elements controlling the evolution of the Gulf of Saros (northeastern Aegean Sea, Turkey). Tectonophysics, 300,22?248.

  • Ocakoğlu, F , Gençoğlu, H , Açıkalın, S . (2006). Saros Körfezi (K Ege Denizi) dip çökellerinin sedimantolojisi . Türkiye Jeoloji Bülteni , 49 (2) , 17-28 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tjb/issue/28448/303080

  • Recent Colored Benthic Foraminifers and Their Mineralogical and Geochemical Features in the Aegean and Southwestern Mediterranean (Gökçeada-Bozcaada-Mitilini Islands and Antalya) Coasts
    Hüseyin Yalçin İbrahim Engin Meriç Niyazi Avşar Sema Tetiker İpek F. Barut Şener Yilmaz Feyza Dinçer
    View as PDF

    Abstract: This study was performed on the recent foraminiferal samples of totally 49 collected fromGökçeada surroundings, southwestern Bozcaada, eastern Mitilini in the northeast of Aegean Sea in and in different points of shores in the southwest of Antalya. Total 24 genus and 41 species offoraminifers with colored shells were distinguished in the four regions. d(104) reflection and MgCO3contents) of calcites vary between 2.979-3.035 Å and 0.33-19.00 % mole, respectively. Mg/Ca andSr/Ca ratios of whole shells have values of 2.95-51.51 and 1.45-10.44. The values are normalized byconsidering maximum and minimum concentrations are respectively due to colorful and colorlessforaminifer shells in the chemical analyses from whole shells and their surfaces. The enrichments inamounts of particularly metallic elements concern with absorption depending on qualitative andquantitative of shell structures although the variations are also related to mineralogicalcompositions of shells. It can be considered that the ions transferred in hot waters coming fromactive faults in the sea-floor and/or the ions transported with cold waters releasing from land areenriched in the sea, and finally they caused an abnormal contamination within the shells and/orsecondarily richness during metabolism by livings.

  • Benthic Foraminifer

  • Shell Chemistry

  • Colored and Colorless Shells

  • XRD shell mineralogy


  • Yalçın, H , Meriç, E , Avşar, N , Tetiker, S , Barut, İ , Yılmaz, Ş , Dinçer, F . (2006). Ege ve Güneybatı Akdeniz (Gökçeada-Bozcada-Midilli adası ve Antalya) sahillerinde gözlenen Güncel renkli bentik foraminifer türleri ve bunların mineralojik ve jeokimyasal özellikleri . Türkiye Jeoloji Bülteni , 49 (2) , 29-51 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tjb/issue/28448/303081

  • ISSUE FULL FILE
    View as PDF