Türkiye Jeoloji Bülteni
  • Home
  • 2008 AĞUSTOS Cilt 51 Sayı 2
Türkiye Jeoloji Bülteni

Türkiye Jeoloji Bülteni

2008 AĞUSTOS Cilt 51 Sayı 2
COVER
View as PDF
COPYRIGHT PAGE
View as PDF
CONTENTS
View as PDF
PREFACE
View as PDF
Investigation of Soil Behaviour in the Gediz Graben by Stochastic Strong Ground Motion Simulation
Nihal Akyol Oğuz Demir M. Ali Danişman Ulubey Çeken
View as PDF

Abstract: Determination of source, path and site characteristics in the Western Anatolia Region, which is one ofthe most seismically and tectonically active continental regions in the world, is a very important issue inthe sense of scaling the seismic hazard of a possible large earthquake. For that reason, the soil behaviorof the sedimentary fills of the Gediz Graben in the region was investigated. At first, site amplificationsand natural resonance frequencies of the two sites (IZM/zmir and BRN/Bornova stations) in Izmir weredetermined using micro and moderate sized earthquake data from two accelerometers operated by theTurkish National Strong Motion Network. After that, the detailed geology, stratigraphy, seismicreflection, gravity, resistivity, hydrogeology, water supply and well-logging studies in the graben wereexamined in order to obtain vertical distributions of average velocity and regional (anelastic)attenuation values for the sedimentary fill of the Gediz Graben. The Estimated vertical velocity andanelastic attenuation distributions were used as input parameters for the Quarter-WavelengthApproximation in order to determine an average site amplification function. Utilizing theseamplification values, the Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) and Spectral Acceleration (5% dampedspectral acceleration, SA) values of a hypothetical earthquake, with Mw=7.0 and hypocentral depth=10km, were simulated in order to see the interaction between structures and this event, at differentdistances on the sedimentary fill of the Gediz Graben. The results implied that an obtained maximumPGA value is 0.42 g and the maximum horizontal SA value is 1.2 g at 0.3 sec at the epicentral locationof the hypothetical earthquake. Dominant periods are 0.3 sec for hypocentral distances of 10-30 km and0.5 sec for the hypocentral distance of 100 km in the Gediz Graben. 

  • Strong Ground Motion

  • Stochastic simulation

  • Site amplification

  • Gediz Graben

  • Western Anatolia

  • Aknc, A. ve Akyol, N., 2000. Importance of Alluvial Thickness in the Earthquake Ground Motion. Proceedings of the Third Japan-Turkey Workshop on Earthquake Eng., vol.1, 189-197.

  • Akyol, N., Aknc, A. ve Eyidoan, H., 2002. Site Amplification of S-waves in Bursa City and Its Vicinity, Northwestern Turkey: Comparison of Different Approaches. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Eng., 22,579-587.

  • Bard, P. Y. ve Ghavez-Garcia, F. J., 1993. On the Decoupling of Surficial Sediments from Surrounding Geology at Mexico City. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 83, 1979-1991.

  • Boore, D. M., 1996. SMSIM-Fortran Programs for Simulating Ground Motions from Earthquakes, Version 1.0. U. S. Geol. Survey, Open-file report 96-80-A.

  • Bozkurt, E., 2001. Neotectonics of Turkey – a Synthesis. Geodinamica Acta, 14, 3-30.

  • Bozkurt, E. ve Park, R. G., 1994. Southern Menderes Massif: An Incipient Metamorphic Core Complex in Western Anatolia, Turkey. J. Geol. Soc. London, 151, 213-216.

  • Bozkurt, E. ve Sözbilir, H., 2004. Tectonic Evolution of the Gediz Graben: Field Evidence for an Episodic, Two-Stage Extension in Western Turkey. Geological Magazine, 141, 63-79.

  • Castro, R. R., Pacor, F. Ve Petrungaro, C., 1997. Determination of S-wave Energy Release of Earthquakes in the Region of Friuli, Italy. Geophs. J. Int., 128, 339-408.

  • Cong L. ve Mitchell, J. B., 1999. Lg Coda Q and Its Relation to the Geology and Tectonics of the Middle East, Pure Appl. Geophys., 153, 563-585.

  • Drawinski, M., Ding, G. ve Wen, K. L., 1996. Analysis of Spectral Ratios for Estimating Ground Motion in Deep Basins. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 86, 843-847.

  • Emre, T., 1996. Gediz Grabeni’nin Tektonik Evrimi. Türkiye Jeoloji Bülteni, 39, 2, 1-18.

  • Emre, T. ve Sözbilir, H., 1997. Field Evidence for Metamorphic Core Complex, Detachment Faulting and Accommondation Faults in the Gediz and Büyük Menderes Grabens (Western Turkey). Int. Earth Sci. Colloquium on the Aegean Region, Proceedings, 1, 73-9

  • Field, E.H. ve Jacob K., 1995. A Comparison and Test of Various Site-Response Estimation Techniques Including Three that are not Reference-Site Dependent. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 85, 1127- 1143.

  • Hanks, T. C. ve McGuire, R. K., 1981. The Character of High Frequency Strong Ground Motion. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 71, 2071-2095.

  • Hermann, R. B. ve Aknc, A., 1999. Probabilistic Seismic Hazard for the Central United States. Seism. Soc. of Am., 94rd Annual Meeting, May 3-5, Seattle, Washington, USA.

  • Joyner, W. B., Warrick R. E. ve Fumal, T. E., 1981. The Effects of Quaternary Alluvium on Strong Ground Motion in the Coyote Lake, California Earthquake of 1979. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 71, 1333-1349.

  • Koçyiğit, A., Yusufoğlu, H. ve Bozkurt, E., 1999. Evidence from the Gediz Graben for Episodic Two-Stage Extension in Western Turkey. J. Geol. Soc. London, 156, 605-616.

  • Lachet, C. ve Bard, P. Y., 1994. Numerical and Theoretical Investigations on the Possibilities and Limitations of the

  • Lachet, C., Hatzfeld, D., Bard. P. Y., Theodulidis, N., Papaioannou, C. ve Savvaidis, A., 1996. Site Effects and Microzonation in the City of Thessaloniki (Greece)-Comparison of Different Approaches. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 86, 1692- 1703.

  • Lermo, J. ve Chavez-Garcia F. J. 1994., Site Effect Evaluation at Mexico City: Dominant Period and Relative Amplification from Strong Motion and Microtremor Records. Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 13, 413-423.

  • Nakamura, Y., 1989. A Method for Dynamic Characteristics Estimations of Subsurface using Microtremors on the Ground Surface. Quarterly Rept. RTRI, Jpn., 30, 25-33.

  • Sar, C. ve Şalk, M., 2006. Sediment thicknesses of the western Anatolia graben structures determined by 2D and 3D analysis using gravity data. J. Asian Earth Sci., 26, 39–48.

  • Seyitoğlu, G. ve Scott, B.-C., 1996. The Cause of N-S Extensional Tectonics in Western Turkey: Tectonic Escape vs Back-Arc spreading vs Orogenic Collapse. J. Geodynamics, 22(1), 145- 153.

  • Street, R., Wang, Z., Woolery, E., Hunt, J. ve Harris, J., 1997. Site Effects as a Vertical Accelerometer Array Near Paducah, Kentucy. Eng. Geology, 46, 349-367.

  • Toro, G. R., Silva, W. J., McGuire, R. K. ve Herrmann, R. B., 1992. Probabilistic Hazard Mapping of the Mississippi Embayment. Seism. Res. Lett., 63, 3, 449-475.

  • Yalcinkaya, E. ve Alptekin, Ö., 2005a. Contributions of the Basin Edge Induced Surface Waves to Site Effect in the Dinar Basin, Southwestern Turkey. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 162, 931-950.

  • Yalcinkaya, E. ve Alptekin Ö., 2005b. Site Effect and Its Relationship with the Intensity and Damage Observed in the June 27, 1998 Adana-Ceyhan Earthquake. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 162, 913-930.

  • Ylmaz, Y., Genç, S. C., Gürer, O. F., Bozcu, M., Ylmaz, K., Karack, Z., Aktunkaynak, . ve Elmas, A., 2000. When did the Western Anatolian Grabens Begin to Develop? eds: Bozkurt, E., Winchester, J. A., Piper, J. D. A., Tectonics and Magmatism in Turk


  • Akyol, N , Demir, O , Danışman, M , Çeken, U . (2008). Stokastik Kuvvetli Yer Hareketi Simülasyonu ile Gediz Grabeninde Zemin Davranışlarının İncelenmesi / Investigation of Soil Behaviour in the Gediz Graben by Stochastic Strong Ground Motion Simulation . Türkiye Jeoloji Bülteni , 51 (2) , 63-76 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tjb/issue/28370/301644

    • Historical Earthquakes of Ancient Perinthos (Marmara Erelisi) until the 15th Century
    T. Levent Erel Cengiz Zabci H. Serdar Akyüz Namik Çağatay
    View as PDF

    Abstract: Byzantion (stanbul), Perinthos (Marmara Erelisi), and Cyzikos (Belkıs) were the most important portsof the Marmara Sea in ancient times. While Byzantion was an estuary, Perinthos and Cyzikos weretombolo type ports. Although Byzantion has continued to develop since its foundation, Perinthos has lostits importance as a port in the Marmara Sea, and Cyzikos has been abandoned and turned in the Belkıs ruins. Another point shared by Perinthos and Cyzikos, which were turned in ports after theFlandrian transgression, is that they are very close to branches of the North Anatolian Fault. Perinthosis located on the northern shoreline of the Marmara Sea, 90 km west of the Bosphorus. The northernbranch of the North Anatolian Fault crosses just a few km to the south of the town. Earthquakes,tectonic uplift, tsunamis, offshore landslides and floods have had natural effects on the foundation anddevelopment of this ancient city. Although Perinthos is on a seismically active area, there areinsufficient historical records of faulting events with the exception of those which heavily damagedIstanbul. The oldest earthquake record is a December 427 BC event; the intensity of the Geliboluearthquake was VIII in 282 BC; but the effects of the 90 BC Saros and 93 BC Canakkale earthquakesare unknown for Perinthos. There are historical records of repairs on the City walls in the 2nd and 3rdcenturies.. The damage to these city walls might have happened after the 10 November 117 Kapıda Peninsula, 138 Çanakkale-Bandırma, 160 Çanakkale and 3 May 170 Marmara Sea earthquakes.Perinthos was still alive at the beginning of Byzantine era. The residents of the town asked the EmperorTheododius the Second for the restoration of aqueducts which were damaged by the 430 Istanbulearthquake (I=VIII). While there were no significant known effects of the 478 Çanakkale and 484Gelibolu events, damage from the 6 September 543, 553 Canakkale, 557 Silivri and 558 Istanbul oneswere fixed immediately. The name of the town changed to Herakleia in this period. Aqueducts and citywalls were repaired again in Justinian`s times (527-568). Other earthquakes that effected the townoccurred in 715, 740 (Marmara Sea and Thrace shores), 760 (Istanbul and Thrace), 860 (Marmara),989 (Marmara), 23 September 1063/1064 (Bandırma, Cyzikos, İznik, Mürefte, Istanbul), 1296 (Istanbul,Marmara), 1343 (Erei-Ganos), 14 October 1344 (Gelibolu, Thrace shores, Istanbul Marmara Island),1 March 1354 (Gelibolu, Marmara northern shores, Thrace), September-November 1437 (Istanbul andGelibolu).

  • Perinthos

  • Marmara Ereglisi

  • historical earthquake

  • Akit, O., 1985. Roma İmparatorluk Tarihi (MÖ. 27- MS. 395), stanbul Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fak. Yay., No: 2052, stanbul

  • Ambraseys, N.N., 2002. The Seismic Activity of the Marmara Sea region over the last 2000 years, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 92, ss.1-18

  • Ardel, A., 1956. Marmara Bölgesinde Coğrafi Müahedeler, stanbul Üniversitesi Corafya Enstitüsü Dergisi, 4, 7, 1-16, stanbul

  • Ardel, A. ve İnandk, H., 1956. Marmara Denizi’nin teekkül ve tekamülü, Türk Corafya Dergisi, Yl XIII. 17, 1-19, Ankara

  • Armijo, R., Pondard, N., Meyer, B., Uçarkus, G., de Lepinay, BM., Malavieille, J., Dominguez, S., Gustcher, MA., Schmidt, S., Beck, C., Caatay, N., Cakr, Z., Imren, C., Eri, K., Natalin, B., Ozalaybey, S., Tolun, L., Lefevre, I., Seeber, L., Gasperi

  • Asgari, N., 1988. Perinthos 1986 çalmalar, V. Aratrma Sonuçlar toplants, 610 Nisan 1987, TC. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanl Eski Eserler ve Müzeler Genel Müdürlüü Yay., 135-146, Ankara

  • Bury, J.B., 1923. A history of Greece to the Death of Alexander the Great, the Modern Library, New York

  • Dernschwam, H., 1988. İstanbul ve Anadolu Seyahat Günlüü (1553-1555), çev: Y. Önen, Kültür ve Turizm Bakanl Yay., No: 885, Ankara

  • Erel, T.L. ve Çağatay, M.N., 2003. Kuzey Marmara’da Perinthos Herakleia (Marmara Erelisi) limanlarnda tarihsel depremlerdeki morfolojik deiimler, Türkiye Kuvaterneri Çaltay IV 29-30 Mays 2003, TÜ Avrasya Yerbilimleri Enstitüsü, stanbul

  • Galland, A., 1987.İstanbul!a ait günlük hatralar, cilt 1 (1672), cilt 2 (1673), yaynlayan: C. Schefer, çev: N.S. Örik, Atatürk Kültür, Dil ve Tarih Yüksek Kurumu Türk Tarih Kurumu Yay., II. dizi, say:16, Ankara

  • Gibbon, E., 1994. Bizans Roma tarihinin gerileyi ve çökü tarihi cilt IV, Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yay., stanbul

  • Guidoboni, E., 1994. Catalogue of Ancient earthquakes in the Mediterranean area up to the 10th century, ING, Roma

  • Guidoboni, E. ve Comastri, A., 2005. Catalogue of earthquakes and tsunamis in the Mediterranean area from the 11th to the 15th century, INGV, Roma

  • Heredotos, 1973. Heredot tarihi, çev: M. Ökmen-A. Erhat, Remzi Kitabevi, stanbul

  • Heyd, W., 1975. Yakn Doğu ticaret tarihi, çev: E. Karal, Türk Tarih Kurumu yaynlar, X. dizi say:7, Ankara

  • Iohannes Malalas, Chronographia, ed. L.Dindorf, CSHB, Bonn 1831. The chronicle, trans. E.Jeffreys, M.Jeffreys, R.Scott [et al.], Sydney 1986.

  • Iohannes Zonaras, Epitome historiarum libri I-XII, ed. B.G.Niebuhr, CSHB, Bonn 1844. Libri XIIIXVIII, ed. Th.Büttner-Wobst, CSHB, Bonn 1897.

  • Ksenophon, 1939. Anabis Onbinlerin Ricat, çev: H. Örs, Remzi Kitabevi, stanbul

  • Mantran, R., 1980. 17. Yüzyln ikinci yarsnda İstanbul, II. cilt, çev: M.A. Klçbay –E. Özcan, Atatürk Kültür, Dil ve Tarih Yüksek Kurumu

  • Miroğlu, İ., 1997. Osmanl Yol Sistemine Dair, İstanbul Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakülesi Tarih Enstitüsü dergisi, Prof. Dr. Münir Aktepe’ye armaan, 15, 1995-1997, 241-252, stanbul

  • Myres, J.L., 1953. Geographical History in Greek Lands, Oxford Press, London

  • Ostrogorsky, G., 1981. Bizans Devleti Tarihi, çev: F. Iltan, Türk Tarih Kurumu Yay. X. Dizi, 7, Ankara.

  • Ozansoy, E., 2001. Bizans kaynaklarna göre 1200- 1453 stanbul depremleri, Tarih boyunca Anadolu’da doal afetler ve depremler semineri 22-23 Mays 2000, 1-27, stanbul

  • Özdoan, M., 1982. Doğu Marmara ve Trakya aratrmalar, Türk Arkeoloji dergisi, say XXVI-1, Kültür ve Turizm Bakanl Eski Eserler ve Müzeler Genel Müdürlüü Yay., 37-62, Ankara

  • Öztürk, N.Ö., 2001. Marmara Ereğlisi Bat Nekropolü kurtarma kazs, II. Müze çalmalar ve kurtarma kazlar sempozyumu, 24-26 Nisan 2001 Denizli, TC. Kültür Bakanl Antlar ve Müzeler Genel Müdürlüü Yay., 83-92, Ankara

  • Sayar, M.H., 1990. Trakya’da epigrafi ve tarihicoğrafya aratrmalar, VII. Aratrma Sonuçlar Toplants, 18-23 Mays Ankara, TC. Kültür Bakanl Antlar ve Müzeler Genel Müdürlüü Yay., 211-216, Ankara

  • Sayar, M.H., 1998. Doğu Trakya’da epigrafi ve tarihicoğrafya aratrmalar 1996, XV. Aratrma Sonuçlar Toplants, TC. Kültür Bakanl Yay., 323-330, Ankara

  • Sayar, M.H., 2001. Doğu Trakya’da epigrafi ve tarihicoğrafya aratrmalar 1999, XVIII. Aratrma Sonuçlar Toplants, 22-26 Mays 2000, zmir, TC. Kültür Bakanl Yay. 289- 300, Ankara

  • Talklolu, Z., 1961a. Trakya’da Epigrafya Aratrmalar cilt I, İstanbul Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Yay., No: 886, stanbul

  • Talklolu, Z., 1961b. Trakya’da Epigrafya Aratrmalar cilt II, İstanbul Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Yay., No: 1654, stanbul


  • Erel, T , Zabcı, C , Akyüz, H , Çağatay, N . (2008). Antik Perinthos (Marmara Ereğlisi) Kentinin 15. Yüzyıla Kadar Gerçekleşen Tarihsel Depremleri / Historical Earthquakes of Ancient Perinthos (Marmara Ereğlisi) until the 15th Century . Türkiye Jeoloji Bülteni , 51 (2) , 77-90 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tjb/issue/28370/301647

    • Evidence for a kinematically linked E-W trending Izmir Fault and NE-trending Seferihisar Fault: Kinematic and paleoseismogical studies carried out on active faults forming the Izmir Bay, Western Anatolia
    Hasan Sözbilir Bora Uzel Ökmen Sümer Uğur İnci Emrah Yalçin Ersoy Tufan Koçer Ramazan Demirtaş Çağlar Özkaymak
    View as PDF

    Abstract: İzmir Bay, one of the recent structures of Westen Anatolia, is a marine basin controlled by NE, NW, N-Sand E-W trending active faults. The southern sector of the bay is bounded by the Izmir Fault, lying between Konak and Güzelbahçe village. The zmir Fault in this section is made up of two mainsegments trending approximately in an E-W direction, and is mapped on a 1/25000 scale from Balçova to Güzelbahçe Village. According to field studies, the İzmir Fault is an oblique-slip normal fault dippingto the north. The northern sector of the bay between Bayraklı and Karşıyaka districts is bounded by the Karşıyaka Fault, which is antithetic to the zmir Fault. In this section, the Karşıyaka Fault ischaracterised by an oblique-slip normal fault dipping to the North.The Seferihisar Fault, which is approximately developed and normal to the Izmir Fault, and hasbeen mapped from Sığacık Bay to Güzelbahçe-Yelki district, forms the eastern margin of the Urla basin.The segment of the Seferihisar Fault that lies between Sığacık Bay and Yelki Village is in the form of aN20E trending right-lateral strike-slip fault. The 5 km length of the fault segment lying between Yelkiand Güzelbahçe trends in a N50E direction and, beginning from Güzelbahçe village, is transformed in the zmir Fault toward the northeast. Within the excavated trenches on the fault segments mapped on a1/1000 scale, it is established that the strike-slip fault (Seferihisar Fault) is transformed by bending in the normal fault (the zmir Fault).Kinematic analysis carried out at 9 stations suggest that the paleostress forming the faults hascontrolled under an approximately N-S extensional direction associated with an E-W contraction. The data support that the kinematically linked Izmir Fault, Seferihisar Fault and Karşıyaka Fault contributed to the opening of Izmir Bay as a response to the transtensional forces.

  • Active Fault

  • Seferihisar Fault

  • Izmir Fault

  • Karsiyaka Fault

  • Izmir Bay

  • Paleoseismology

  • Fault Kinematics

  • Akdeniz, N., Konak, N., Öztürk, Z., ve Çakr, M.H., 1986. zmir-Manisa dolaynn jeolojisi: MTA Rapor No: 7929 (yaymlanmam).

  • Aksu, A.E. ve Piper, DJ.W., 1983. Progradation of the Late Quaternary Gediz Delta, Turkey. Marine Geology, 54, 1-25.

  • Aksu, A.E., Piper, DJ.W. ve Konuk, T., 1987. Quaternary growth patterns of Büyük Menderes and Küçük Menderes deltas, western Turkey. Sedimentary Geology, 52, 227-250.

  • Aksu, A.E., Konuk, T.,Ulu, A., Duman, M. ve Piper, D.J.W., 1990. Quaternary tectonic and sedimentary history of eastern Agean Sea shelf area. Jeofizik, 4, 3-36.

  • Aktar, M., Karabulut, H., Ozalaybey, S. ve Childs, D. 2007. A conjugate strike-slip fault system within the extensional tectonics of Western Turkey. Geophysical Journal International, 171 (3) , 1363–1375.

  • Aktuğ, B. ve Klçoğlu, B., 2006. Recent crustal deformation of zmir, Western Anatolia and surrounding regions as deduced from repeated GPS measurements and strain field. Journal of Geodynamics, 41, 471-484.

  • Akyol, N., Zhu, L., Mitchell, B.J., Sözbilir, H. ve Kekoval K., 2006. Crustal structure and local seismicity in western Anatolia. Geophysical Journal International, 166 (3), 1259-1269.

  • Angelier, J., Dumont, J.F., Kahramanderesi, H., Poisson, A., imek, . ve Uysal, S., 1981. Analysis of fault mecanisms and expantion of southwestern Anatolian since Late Miocene. Tectonophysics, 75, 1-9.

  • Angelier, J., 1984. Tectonic analysis of fault slip data sets. Journal of Geophysical Research, 80, 5835-5848.

  • Angelier, J., 1991. Inversion of field data in fault tectonics to obtain regional stress. III: A new rapid direct inversion method by analytical means. Geophysical Journal International, 103, 363-76.

  • Arpat, E. ve Bingöl, E., 1969. Ege Bölgesi graben sisteminin geliimi üzerine düünceler. MTA Dergisi, 73, 1-9.

  • Barka, A., Akyüz, H.S, Cohen H.A. ve Watchorn, F., 2000. Tectonic evolution of the Niksar and Taova-Erbaa pull-apart basins, North Anatolian Fault Zone: their significance for the motion of the Anatolian Block. Tectonophysics, 322, 243-64.


  • Bozkurt, E., 2000. Timing of extension on the Büyük Menderes graben, western Turkey, and its tectonic implications. In: Bozkurt, E., Winchester, J.A. and Piper, J.D.A. (eds.) Tectonics and magmatism in Turkey and the surrounding area. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 173, 385-403.

  • Bozkurt, E., 2001. Neotectonics of Turkey – a synthesis. Geodinamica Acta, 14, 3-30.

  • Bozkurt, E., 2003. Origin of NE-trending basins in western Turkey. Geodinamica Acta, 16, 61-81.

  • Bozkurt, E. ve Park, R.G., 1994. Southern Menderes Massif: an incipient metamorphic core complex in western Anatolia, Turkey. Journal of Geological Society, 151, 213-216.

  • Bozkurt, E. ve Sözbilir H., 2003. Tectonic evolution of the Gediz Graben: field evidence for an episodic, two-stage extension in western Turkey. Geological Magazine, 6, 1-17.

  • Bozkurt, E. ve Sözbilir, H., 2004. Tectonic evolution of the Gediz Graben: field evidence for an episodic, two extension in western Turkey. Geological Magazine, 141, 63-79.

  • Bozkurt, E. ve Sözbilir, H., 2006. Evolution of largescale Normal faults: Insights from the Active Manisa fault, Southwest Turkey. Geodinamica Acta, 19 (6), 427-453.

  • Cohen, H. A., Dart, C., Akyüz, H. S. ve Barka, A., 1995. Syn-rift sedimentation and structural development of the Gediz and Büyük Menderes graben, western Turkey. Journal of the Geological Society, London, 152, 629-638.

  • Dönmez, M., Türkecan, A., Akçay, A.E., Hakyemez, Y. ve Sevin, D., 1998. zmir ve kuzeyinin jeolojisi, Tersiyer volkanizmasnn petrografik ve kimyasal özellikleri. MTA Rapor No: 10181 (yaynlanmam).

  • Drahor, M.G., Berge, M.A., Kurtulmu, T.Ö., Güngör, T., Utku, M. ve Göktürkler, G., 2007. zmirGüzelbahçe’de yaplan tümleik jeofizik aratrmalar ve paleosismolojik hendek çalmalarnn sonuçlar. Aktif Tektonik Aratrma Grubu 11. Toplants, Bildiri Özleri, s 53.

  • Emre, T. 1996. Gediz Grabeni’ nin tektonik evrimi. Türkiye Jeoloji Bülteni, 39 (2),1-18.

  • Emre, Ö. ve Barka, A., 2000. Active faults between Gediz graben and Aegean Sea (zmir region). Bat-Anadolu’nun Depremsellii Sempozyumu, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Yaynlar, Bildiri Kitab, 131-132.

  • Emre, Ö., Özalp, S., Doan, A., Özaksoy, V., Yldrm, C. ve Gökta, F., 2005. zmir çevresinin diri faylar ve deprem potansiyelleri. MTA Rapor No:107, 80 s (yaynlanmam).

  • Emre, T. ve Sözbilir, H., 1997. Field evidence for metamorphic core complex, detachment faulting and accommodation faults in the Gediz and Büyük Menderes Grabens (Western Turkey), In: Ö. Pikin, M. Ergün, M.Y. Savaçn, G. Tarcan (eds.), IESCA Proceedings, 73-94.

  • Erkül, F., Helvac, C. ve Sözbilir, H., 2005. Evidence for two episodes of volcanism in the Bigadiç borate basin and tectonic implications for western Turkey. Geological Journal, 40, 1-16.

  • Genç, C.., Altunkaynak, ., Karack, Z., Yazman, M. ve Ylmaz, Y., 2001. The Çubukluda graben, south of zmir: its tectonic significance in the Neogene geological evolution of the western Anatolia. Geodinamica Acta, 14, 45- 55.

  • Hakyemez, Y.H., Erkal, T. ve Gökta, F., 1999. Late Quaternary evolution of the Gediz and Büyük Menderes grabens, Western Anatolia, Turkey. Quaternary Science Reviews, 18, 549-554.

  • Hancock, P.L. ve Barka, A., 1987. Kinematic indicators on active normal faults in western Turkey. Journal of Structural Geology, 9, 573- 584.

  • Hetzel, R., Ring, U., Akal, C. ve Troesch, M., 1995. Miocene NNE-directed extensional unroofing in the Menderes Massif, southwestern Turkey. Journal of Geological Society, 152, 639-654.

  • Ik, V. 2004. Kuzey Menderes Masifinde Simav Makaslama Zonunun mikrotektonik özellikleri, Bat Anadolu, Türkiye. Türkiye Jeoloji Bülteni, 47 (2), 49-91.

  • Ik, V., Seyitoğlu, G. ve Çemen, İ., 2003. Ductilebrittle transition along the Alasehir shear zone and its structural relationship with the Simav detachment, Menderes massif, western Turkey. Tectonophysics, 374, 1-18.

  • İnci, U., Koçyiğit, A., Bozkurt, E. ve Arpalyiğit, İ., 2003. Soma ve Krkaaç Grabenlerinin Kuvaterner jeolojisi, Bat Anadolu. Türkiye Kuvaterner Çaltay IV, Bildiriler Kitab, 84- 100.

  • İşseven, T., 2001. Bat Anadolu’nun neotektonik rejiminin paleomanyetik çalmalarla incelenmesi. Doktora Tezi, TÜ Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 194 s.

  • Jackson, J. ve McKenzie, D., 1988. The relationship between plate motions and seismic moment tensors, and the rates of active deformation in the Mediterranean and Middle East. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 93 (1), 45-73.

  • Kaya, O., 1979. Ortadou Ege çöküntüsünün (Neojen) stratigrafisi ve tektonii, Türkiye Jeoloji Kurumu Bülteni, 27 (1), 1-7.

  • Kaya, O., 1981. Miocene reference section for the coastal parts of West Anatolia. Newsletters on Stratigraphy, 10, 164-191.

  • Kaya, O., 1982. Tersiyer srt yitmesi: Dou Ege bölgelerinin yaps ve magmatiglii için olasl bir mekanizma; Erol, O. ve Oygür, V. (ed.), Bat Anadolu’nun genç tektonii ve volkanizmas paneli. Türkiye Jeoloji Kongresi, 59-72.

  • Kaya, O., Ünay, E., Saraç, G., Eichhorn, S., Hassenrück, S., Knappe, A., Pekdeer, A. ve Mayda, S., 2004. Halitpaa transpressive zone: implications for an Early Pliocene compressional phase in central western Anatolia, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, 13, 1-13.

  • Kaya, O., Ünay, E., Gökta, F. ve Saraç, G., 2007. Early Miocene stratigraphy of Central West Anatolia, Turkey: implications for the tectonic evolution of the Eastern Aegean area. Geological Journal, 42, 85-109.

  • Kissel, C., Laj, C., Şengör, A. M. C. ve Poisson, A., 1987. Paleomagnetic Evidence for Rotation in Opposite Senses of Adjacent Blocks in Northeastern Aegea and Western Anatolia, Geophysical Research Letters, 14 (9), 907-910.

  • Koçyiğit, A., 1984. Güneybat Türkiye ve yakın dolaynda levha içi yeni tektonik geliim. Türkiye Jeoloji Kurumu Bülteni, 27, 1-16.

  • Koçyiğit, A., Yusufoğlu, H. ve Bozkurt, E., 1999. Evidence form the Gediz graben for episodic two-stage extension in western Turkey. Journal of the Geological Society, London, 156, 605- 616.

  • Koçyiğit, A., Ünay, E. ve Saraç, G., 2000. Episodic graben formation and extensional neotectonic regime in west central Anatolia and the Isparta Angle: a key study in the Akehir-Afyon graben, Turkey; In: E. Bozkurt, J.A. Winchester, J.D.A. Piper, (eds.), Tectonics and Magmatism in Turkey and the Surrounding Area. Geological Society of London, Specical Publication, 173, 405-421.

  • Le Pichon, X. ve Angelier, J., 1979. The Aegean arc and trench system: a key to the neotectonic evolution of the eastern Mediterranean area. Tectonophysics, 60, 1-42.

  • Lips, A. L. W., Cassard, D., Sözbilir, H. ve Ylmaz, H., 2001. Multistage exhumation of the Menderes Massif, western Anatolia (Turkey). International Journal of Earth Sciences, 89, 781-792.

  • MTA 2002. 1/500 000 ölçekli Türkiye jeoloji haritalar, No:7, MTA Yaynlar.

  • Ocakoğlu, N., Demirbaş E. ve Kucu İ., 2004. Neotectonic structures in the area offshore of Alaçat, Doanbey and Kuadas (western Turkey): evidence of strike-slip faulting in the Aegean extensional province. Tectonophysics, 391, 67-83.

  • Ocakoğlu, N., Demirbaş, E. ve Kuçu, İ., 2005. Neotectonic structures in zmir Gulf and surrounding regions (western Turkey): Evidences of strike-slip faulting with compression in the Aegean extensional regime. Marine Geology, 219, 155-171.

  • Ocakoğlu, N., Demirbaş, E. ve Kuçu, İ., 2006. İzmir Körfezi ve çevresinin aktif faylar ve depremsellii (Bat Anadolu). Yerbilimleri Dergisi, 27 (1), 23-40.

  • Okay, A., Satr, M., Maluski, H., Siyako, M., Metzger, R. ve Akyüz, H.S., 1996. Paleo-and NeoTethyan events in northvvest Turkey: Geological and geochronological Constraints: Yin, A. ve Harrison, T.M. (eds.), Tectonic Evolution of Asia, 420-441.

  • Orbay, N., Sanver, M., Hisarli, M., seven, T. ve Özçep, F., 2000. Karaburun Yarmadasnn Paleomagnetizmas ve Tektonik Evrimi. Bat Anadolu` nun Depremsellii Sempozyumu Kitab, 59-67.

  • Özkaymak, Ç. ve Sözbilir, H., 2006. Aktif Manisa faynn bat bölümünün jeolojik özellikleri; deprem üreten faylarda reaktivasyon. Aktif Tektonik Aratrma Grubu 10. Toplants, Bildiri Özleri Kitab, 68-70.

  • Özkaymak Ç. ve Sözbilir H., 2007. Aktif Manisa Faynda Reaktivasyona aret Eden Stratigrafik Ve Jeomorfolojik Kriterler. Çukurova Üniversitesi Jeoloji Mühendislii Bölümü 30. Yl Sempozyumu, Bildiri Özleri Kitab, 177- 178.

  • Paton, S., 1992, Active normal faulting, drainage patterns and sedimantation in southwestern Turkey. Journal of the Geological Society, London, 149, 1031-1044.

  • Reilinger, R.E., McClusky, S., Oral, M.B., King, R.W., Toksöz, M.N., Barka, A.A., Kinik, I.,Lenk, O. ve Sanl, I., 1997. Global positioning system measurements of present day crustal movement in the Arabia-AfricaEurasia plate collision zone. Journal of Geophysical Research, 102, 9983-9999.

  • Ring, U., Susanne, L. ve Matthias, B., 1999. Structural analysis of a complex nappe sequence and late orogenic basins from the Agean Island of Samos, Greece. Journal of Structural Geology, 21, 1575-1601.

  • Sayn, E., Paz, İ. ve Eronat, C., 2006. Investigation of Water Masses in zmir Bay, Western Turkey. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, 15, 343-372.

  • Seyitoğlu, G. ve Scott, B.C., 1991. Late Cenozoic crustal extension and basin formation in west Turkey. Geological Magazine, 128, 155-166.

  • Seyitoğlu, G. ve Scott, B.C., 1992a. The age of the Büyük Menderes graben (west Turkey) and its tectonic implications. Geological Magazine, 129, 239-242.

  • Seyitoğlu, G., ve Scott, B.C., 1992b. Late Cenozoic volcanic evolution of the northeastern Aegean region. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 54, 157-176.

  • Seyitoğlu, G. ve Scott, B.C., 1996. The age of the Alaehir graben (west Turkey) and its tectonic implications. Geological Journal, 31, 1-12.

  • Seyitoğlu, G., Tekeli, O., Çemen, İ., Şen, Ş. ve Ik, V., 2002. The role of the flexural rotation /rolling hinge model in the tectonic evolution of the Alaehir graben, western Turkey. Geological Magazine, 139, 15-26.

  • Sözbilir, H., 2001. Extensional tectonics and the geometry of related macroscopic structures: Field evidence from the Gediz detachment, western Turkey. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, 10, 51-67.

  • Sözbilir, H., 2002. Geometry and origin of folding in the Neogene sediments of the Gediz Graben, western Anatolia, Turkey. Geodinamica Acta, 15, 277-288.

  • Sözbilir, H., 2005. Oligo-Miocene molasse sedimentation during the Lycian orogenic collapse: Sedimentological, stratigraphical and structural evidences from the Lycian Molasse Basin, SW Turkey. Geodinamica Acta, 18 (3- 4), 255-282.

  • Sözbilir, H. ve Emre, T., 1991. Neogene stratigraphy and structure of the northern rim of the Büyük Menderes graben. International Earth Sciences Congress on Aegean Regions, Proceedings, 2, 314-322.

  • Sözbilir, H., Erkül, F. ve Sümer, Ö., 2003a. Gümüldür (İzmir) ve Bigadiç (Balkesir) Arasnda Uzanan Miyosen Sonras Yal KD-Dorultulu Accommodation Zonuna ait Saha Verileri, Bat Anadolu. 56. Türkiye Jeoloji Kurultay, Ankara, 85-86.

  • Sözbilir, H., İnci, U., Erkul, F. ve Sümer, Ö., 2003b. An Active Intermitten transform zone accommodating N-S Extension in Western Anatolia and its relation to the North Anatolian Fault System, International Workshop on the North Anatolian, East Anatolian and Dead Sea Fault Systems: Recent Progress in Tectonics and Paleoseismology, and Field Training Course in Paleoseismology, 31 Augst to 12 September 2003, Poster Session P:2/2, Ankara.

  • Sözbilir, H., Sümer , Ö., Uzel, B., Sayglı, A., Ramazanoğlu, İ ve E. Uysal, 2004. zmir Fay’nn jeolojik ve jeomorfolojik parametreleri, Aktif Tektonik Aratrma Grubu 8. Toplants, Bildiri Özetleri Kitab, s. 22.

  • Sözbilir, H., Sümer, Ö., Uzel, B., Ersoy, Y., Erkül, F., İnci, U. ve Helvac, C., 2005. zmir’deki deprem dizilerinin nedeni, faylardaki çiçek yaps, Cumhuriyet, Bilim Teknik, Deprem Aratrmalar, 3.12.2005, Say 976, 18-19.

  • Sözbilir, H. Koçer, T. Demirta, R., Uzel, B., Ersoy, Y., Akgün, M. ve Özkaymak, Ç., 2006. Seferihisar-Yelki fay zonunda plaeosismolojik çalmalar: dorultu atml fay zonlarnda eim atml aktif normal faylanmaya ait veriler. Aktif Tektonik Aratrma Grubu 10. Toplants, Bildiri Özleri Kitab, 76-77.

  • Sözbilir, H., Sümer, Ö., Uzel, B., Özkaymak, Ç., Ersoy, Y., Erkül, F., nci, U. ve Helvac, C., 2007. Bat Anadolu’da zmir-Balkesir transfer zonu içinde kalan aktif dorultu-atml faylarla snrl havzalarn jeolojik özellikleri. Aktif Tektonik Aratrma Grubu 11. Çaltay, Bildiri Özleri Kitab, s. 42.

  • Sümer Ö., Sözbilir H. ve nci U., 2004. Urla Havzas’nn Kuvaterner jeolojisi ve havzay snrlayan dorultu atml faylarn Bat Anadolu’nun aktif tektoniindeki önemi. Aktif Tektonik Aratrma Grubu 8. Toplants, Bildiri Özleri Kitab, 22-23.

  • Sümer, Ö., Sözbilir, H., nci, U. ve Erkül, F., 2005. Cross-cut relationship between NE- and Etrending faults in western Anatolia: an example from the Quaternary Urla basin. International Symposium on the Geodynamics of Eastern Mediterranean,15-18 June 2005, stanbul, Abstracts, p. 132.

  • Şengör, A.M.C., 1987. Cross-faults and differential stetching of hanging walls in regions of lowangle normal faulting. In: examples from western Turkey, Coward, M.P., Dewey, J.F. and Hancock, P. (ed.), Continental extensional tectonics. Geological Society of London, Special Publication, 28, 575-589.

  • Şengör, A.M.C. ve Ylmaz, Y., 1981. Tethyan evolution of Turkey: A plate tectonic approach. Tectonophysics, 75, 181-241.

  • Şengör, A.M.C., Görür, N. ve Şaroğlu, F., 1985. Strike-slip faulting and related basin formation in zones of tectonic escape: Turkey as a case study. In: Biddle, K. & Christie-Blick, N. (eds.), Strike-Slip Deformation, Basin Formation and Sedimentation. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Special Publications, 37, 227-264.

  • Tan, O. ve Taymaz, T., 2003. Seismotectonics of Karaburun Peninsula and Kuadas Gulf: Source parameters of April 2, 1996 Kuadas Gulf and April 10, 2003 Seferihisar (zmir) earthquakes. International Workshop on the NAFZ, EAFZ and DSF Systems: Recent Progress in Tectonics and Paleoseismology and Field Training Course in Paleoseismology, Middle East Technical University (METU), Ankara, Turkey.

  • Tapırdamaz, M. C., 2005. Türkiye’nin Paleomanyetik Veri Katalou. Aktif Tektonik Aratrma Grubu 9. Toplants, Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi, Mühendislik Fakültesi, 22-24 Eylül 2005, Sivas.

  • Utku, M. ve Sözbilir, H., 2003. Aydn-Nazilli faynn paleosismolojik ön bulgular, Türkiye Kuvaterneri Çaltay, 4, 121-129.

  • Uzel, B. ve Sözbilir, H., 2005. First record of Quaternary pull-apart basin in western Analolia: the Cumaovas basin, zmir-Turkey, International Earth Sciences Colloquium on the Aegen Regions (IESCA), Dokuz Eylül University, 4-7 October 2005, zmir, Turkey.

  • Uzel, B. ve Sözbilir, H., 2006. Bat Anadolu’da normal faylar ve dorultu atml faylarn birlikte iledii havzalara bir örnek: Cumaovas çek-ayr havzas, zmir. Aktif Tektonik Aratrma Grubu 10. Toplants, Bildiri Özleri Kitab, s. 93.

  • Uzel, B. ve Sözbilir, H., 2007. Cumaovas Çek-Ayr Havzasnda Transpresyondan Transtensiyona Yersel Gerilme Terslenmesine Dair Veriler, Bat Anadolu. Çukurova Üniversitesi Jeoloji Mühendislii Bölümü, 30. Yl Jeoloji Sempozuyumu, Bildiri Özleri Kitab, 175-176.

  • Uzel, B. ve Sözbilir, H., 2008. A First record of strikeslip basin in western Anatolia and its tectonic implication: The Cumaovas basin as an example. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences [in press].

  • Ylmaz, Y., Genç, Ş.C., Gürer, F., Bozcu, M., Yılmaz, K., Karack, Z., Altunkaynak, . ve Elmas, A., 2000. When did the western Anatolian grabens begin to develop?. In: Bozkurt, E. Winchester, J.A. & Piper J.A.D. (eds.) Tectonics and magmatism in Turkey and the surrounding area. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 173, 131-162.

  • Yusufoğlu, H., Koçyiğit, A. ve Bozkurt, E., 1998. Palaeo- and Neo-tectonic characteristics of the Gediz Graben, west Anatolia, Turkey. Third International Turkish Geology Symposium, 3, 190.

  • Zhu, L., Akyol, N., Mitchell, B.J. ve Sözbilir H., 2006. Seismotectonics of western Turkey from high resolutions and moment tensor determinations. Geophysical Research Letters, 33 (7), L07316.

  • Sözbilir, H , Uzel, B , Sümer, Ö , Özkaymak, Ç , Ersoy, E , Koçer, T , Demirtaş, R . (2008). D-B Uzanml İzmir Fay İle KD-Uzanımlı Seferihisar Fayı’nın Birlikte Çalıştığına Dair Veriler: İzmir Körfezi’ni Oluşturan Aktif Faylarda Kinematik Ve Paleosismolojik Çalışmalar, Batı Anadolu . Türkiye Jeoloji Bülteni , 51 (2) , 91-114 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tjb/issue/28370/301652

    • ISSUE FULL FILE
    View as PDF